Proceedings of the 1st Lawang Sewu International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences 2022 (LEWIS 2022)

Profile of Students’ Geometric Thinking Ability in Terms of Van Hiele Level

Authors
Venissa Dian Mawarsari1, *, St. Budi Waluya2, Nuriana Rachmani Dewi2
1Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
2Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
*Corresponding author. Email: venissa@unimus.ac.id
Corresponding Author
Venissa Dian Mawarsari
Available Online 26 June 2023.
DOI
10.2991/978-2-38476-078-7_13How to use a DOI?
Keywords
Geometric thinking; Van Hiele Level; Characteristic of Student’
Abstract

The ability to think geometrically is very important to be improved in students at all levels of school, from an early age to college. In the ability to think geometry, there is a level which of course an individual will have according to age level and school level. This includes universities, where students who can think abstractly and logically will be at level 3 (informal deduction) or 4 (rigor). But of course, it is necessary to study more deeply the characteristics at each level of thinking possessed by students. Given this need, the purpose of this study is to determine the profile of students’ geometric thinking abilities based on Leve Van Hiele. This research is a qualitative descriptive study by describing the ability to think geometry based on the van Hiele level. The research sample is the 3rd-semester students of the mathematics education study program at one of the private universities in Semarang who have received the spatial geometry course. Data were obtained from van Hiele-level evaluation tests, observations, and interviews. The results showed that the ability to think geometrically is level 4, requires time to think about how to solve the problem of proof, needs to dig deeper and recall the concepts involved in solving it. The ability to think at level 3, students actually solve it in a different way. The ability to think at level 2, students can complete a good process and use the concepts they already have and interviews. The results showed that the ability to think geometrically level 4, requires time to think about how to solve the problem of proof, and needs to dig deeper and recall the concepts involved in solving it. The ability to think at level 3, students actually solve it in a different way. The ability to think at level 2, students can complete a good process and use the concepts they already have and interviews. The results showed that the ability to think geometrically level 4, requires time to think about how to solve the problem of proof, and needs to dig deeper and recall the concepts involved in solving it. The ability to think at level 3, students actually solve it in a different way. The ability to think at level 2, students can complete it a good process and use the concepts they already have.

Copyright
© 2023 The Author(s)
Open Access
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Download article (PDF)

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 1st Lawang Sewu International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences 2022 (LEWIS 2022)
Series
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
Publication Date
26 June 2023
ISBN
10.2991/978-2-38476-078-7_13
ISSN
2352-5398
DOI
10.2991/978-2-38476-078-7_13How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2023 The Author(s)
Open Access
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - Venissa Dian Mawarsari
AU  - St. Budi Waluya
AU  - Nuriana Rachmani Dewi
PY  - 2023
DA  - 2023/06/26
TI  - Profile of Students’ Geometric Thinking Ability in Terms of Van Hiele Level
BT  - Proceedings of the 1st Lawang Sewu International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences 2022 (LEWIS 2022)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 109
EP  - 117
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-078-7_13
DO  - 10.2991/978-2-38476-078-7_13
ID  - Mawarsari2023
ER  -