Junior High School Students' Reasoning

DOI

10.2991/icmsed-16.2017.26How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Component Argumentation; Reasoning

Abstract

This research aims toidentify at the argument of students reasoning between the group trained with reasoning and withouttraining. The method used was quasi-experiment. With the sampling technique by the cluster random sampling. Total sample of 33 students in experimental group and 33 students control group were chosen by random cluster sampling. The reasoning item test was used as an instrument which isassociated by the biological concepts. The reasoning item test is wasmodifiedbased on Toulmin Argumentation Patterns (TAP) which consisted of claim, data, warrant, backing, qualifier, rebuttal. The results showed the completeness argumentation component of students who got trained at level 1 (0.51%), level 2 (78.79%), level 3 (16.67%), level 4 (3.03%). While the students without reasoning training at level 1 (4.55%), level 2 (93.43%), level 3 (2.53%), level 3 (3.03%).

Copyright

© 2017, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Putri D Renocha
AU  - Diana Rochintaniawati
AU  - Ari Widodo
PY  - 2017/01
DA  - 2017/01
TI  - Junior High School Students' Reasoning
BT  - Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 118
EP  - 121
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/icmsed-16.2017.26
DO  - 10.2991/icmsed-16.2017.26
ID  - Renocha2017/01
ER  -