Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2020)

Evaluation of Preceptorship Implementation Process and Application of the Philosophy of Midwifery in the Cycle III (Midwifery Care for Physiological Delivery) at the Midwifery Independent Clinic (PMB) at the Clerkship of the Midwifery Professional Education

Authors
Lusiana El Sinta Bustami, Erda Mutiara Halida
Corresponding Author
Lusiana El Sinta Bustami
Available Online 3 February 2021.
DOI
10.2991/assehr.k.210202.052How to use a DOI?
Keywords
Preceptorship, preceptor, preceptee, bedside teaching, women-centered care
Abstract

One of the ways to develop the quality of clinical learning is by applying suitable preceptorship methods. So far, the implementation of clinical learning activities still needs special attention. Clinical learning methods have not been implemented optimally. Some of the problems that still occur in the clinical learning process include the immense workload of the preceptors where the work of the preceptors overlaps with the functional tasks at work, the lack of opportunities given by students to take action, the lack of time to discuss between students and the receptors considering a large number of clients served. This results in reduced adequate time and attention to guide students. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation process of the third cycle of Preceptorship (midwifery care for physiological delivery) at PMB at the clerkship of the midwife professional education clinic. With a cross-sectional approach, this analytical study was conducted in 21 Independent Midwives Practices from April to August 2020. The sample of the study was all Midwifery Professional Education students who had completed the clinical clerkship process in Cycle III. Data collection by interview. Univariate data analysis. The results showed that the percentage of the preceptorship implementation process was not good (52.5%), and the percentage of the midwifery philosophy application was in a suitable category (50.8%). It can be concluded that implementing the preceptorship process, respectively, needs evaluation, and applying the philosophy of midwifery is quite good and needs to be improved.

Copyright
© 2021, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2020)
Series
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
Publication Date
3 February 2021
ISBN
978-94-6239-325-7
ISSN
2352-5398
DOI
10.2991/assehr.k.210202.052How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2021, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - Lusiana El Sinta Bustami
AU  - Erda Mutiara Halida
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021/02/03
TI  - Evaluation of Preceptorship Implementation Process and Application of the Philosophy of Midwifery in the Cycle III (Midwifery Care for Physiological Delivery) at the Midwifery Independent Clinic (PMB) at the Clerkship of the Midwifery Professional Education
BT  - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2020)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 295
EP  - 299
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210202.052
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.210202.052
ID  - Bustami2021
ER  -