Three Methods of Online Learning in Studying Law for Students’ Critical Thinking: Which One is More Effective?
- DOI
- 10.2991/assehr.k.220108.002How to use a DOI?
- Keywords
- Critical Thinking; Effectiveness; Law Learning Methods
- Abstract
The pandemic condition for online learning of Civics Education created not only a challenge for students but also for teachers, material dealing with law for students in Senior High School was considered difficult because it contained only theory and concepts. This caused students to tend to be less skilled in critical thinking. Therefore, teachers must look for effective learning methods and then the characteristics must be tailored to the needs of students. This study aimed to determine the difference in effectiveness and which method was more effective between courtroom methods, debate and law comparison between countries. The research design was quantitative with an experimental approach. The comparison of the three methods was a novelty apart from the online method, the three of them were considered to be effective with a significance of 0.081 (Sig.> 0.05) and the learning method using the courtroom was more effective than the debate method and law comparison.
- Copyright
- © 2022 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Agustinus Tampubolon AU - Margi Wahono AU - Pat Kurniati AU - Matang Matang AU - Wachid P PY - 2022 DA - 2022/01/21 TI - Three Methods of Online Learning in Studying Law for Students’ Critical Thinking: Which One is More Effective? BT - Proceedings of the Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2021) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 6 EP - 10 SN - 2352-5398 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220108.002 DO - 10.2991/assehr.k.220108.002 ID - Tampubolon2022 ER -