Artery Research

<Previous Article In Issue
Next Article In Issue>
Volume 3, Issue 4, December 2009, Pages 163 - 163

P1.10 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PULSE WAVE VELOCITY BY TWO DIFFERENT DEVICES

Authors
A. Vicente Casanova, F. Martinez Garcia, E. Solaz Moreno, O. Calaforra Juan, M. Bori Gines, J. Redon i Mas
Hospital Clinico Universitario, Department of Internal Medicine, Valencia, Spain
Available Online 3 December 2009.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2009.10.013How to use a DOI?
Abstract

Background: According to the 2007 European Society of Hypertension guidelines, measurement of arterial stiffness (AS) is recommended in patients with arterial hypertension (HT). The carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) appears to be the “gold standard” for evaluation on vascular changes in these patients. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) has been incorporated to other devices used for assessment of Augmentation index (AI). The aim of this study was to assess the concordance of PWV measured using Complior and Sphygmocor devices.

Material and methods: PWV was measured on a single visit, using both devices in a group of 67 patients, 38 females (57%),54 (80%) were hipertensives under treatment; mean age 59,9±10,48, BMI 28,7±4,2 Kg/m2; SBP 134±16,6 mmHg.; DBP 79±12 mmHg.; SBPa 124,3±16,6 mmHg,;DBPa 81,2±11,7 mmHg.

Results: PWV measured using Complior (11, 2±2, 2m/s) was significantly higher than that obtained using Sphygmocor (9, 5±2, 4m/s). The correlations of the PWV assessed with the Complior with the values obtained using Sphygmocor was r=0, 73. The correlation coefficient was higher for women (r=0, 80) as compared to men (r=0, 59). The Bland-Altman plot indicated that the discrepancies between the two methods depend on the VOP values. The higher the value, the higher the discrepancies.

Conclusions: If the gold standard to measure the PWV is the Complior device, assessment of PWV using other devices needs to be carefully evaluated.

Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Download article (PDF)
View full text (HTML)

<Previous Article In Issue
Next Article In Issue>
Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
3 - 4
Pages
163 - 163
Publication Date
2009/12/03
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2009.10.013How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

risenwbib
TY  - JOUR
AU  - A. Vicente Casanova
AU  - F. Martinez Garcia
AU  - E. Solaz Moreno
AU  - O. Calaforra Juan
AU  - M. Bori Gines
AU  - J. Redon i Mas
PY  - 2009
DA  - 2009/12/03
TI  - P1.10 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PULSE WAVE VELOCITY BY TWO DIFFERENT DEVICES
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 163
EP  - 163
VL  - 3
IS  - 4
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2009.10.013
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2009.10.013
ID  - VicenteCasanova2009
ER  -