Plato and Gender Equality in The Republic
Authors
Chen Ling, Yiheng Ding
Corresponding Author
Chen Ling
Available Online 13 February 2020.
- DOI
- 10.2991/assehr.k.200205.041How to use a DOI?
- Keywords
- Plato, The Republic, gender equality, is-ought gap
- Abstract
Plato’s The Republic is commonly perceived to be a foe of gender equality, but this perception is ill-founded. Many lines involving, from a modern view, contempt for women’s physical strength, mental capacity and potential for virtue are taken as evidence of Plato’s opposition to the ideal of gender equality. However, those lines are merely indications of Plato’s empirical rather than normative judgment. The is-ought gap warns of the insufficiency of the deduction from those putative pieces of evidence alone that Plato is against the ideal of gender equality.
- Copyright
- © 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Chen Ling AU - Yiheng Ding PY - 2020 DA - 2020/02/13 TI - Plato and Gender Equality in The Republic BT - Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Social Science, Public Health and Education (SSPHE 2019) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 194 EP - 196 SN - 2352-5398 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200205.041 DO - 10.2991/assehr.k.200205.041 ID - Ling2020 ER -