To What Extent Can Affirmative Action Be Considered Ethical in the Gratz v. Bollinger Case
Authors
Zhiyao Tang1, *
1University of California, Los Angeles (College of Letters and Science), Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
*Corresponding author.
Email: mandytang508@g.ucla.edu
Corresponding Author
Zhiyao Tang
Available Online 11 July 2023.
- DOI
- 10.2991/978-2-38476-062-6_141How to use a DOI?
- Keywords
- Affirmative action in higher education; ethics; Gratz v. Bollinger; utilitarianism
- Abstract
This essay intends to examine whether affirmative action in the Gratz v. Bollinger case (2003) can be justified as ethical under Jeremy Bentham’s utilitarian perspective. This essay offers an exhaustive case review of this lawsuit and evaluates the economic and educational effects of the University of Michigan’s practice of affirmative action in a relevant five-year period from 1995 to 2000. Related literature and empirical data are offered along with a discussion on the Supreme court’s decision on this lawsuit.
- Copyright
- © 2023 The Author(s)
- Open Access
- Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Zhiyao Tang PY - 2023 DA - 2023/07/11 TI - To What Extent Can Affirmative Action Be Considered Ethical in the Gratz v. Bollinger Case BT - Proceedings of the 2023 2nd International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities and Arts (SSHA 2023) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 1097 EP - 1103 SN - 2352-5398 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-062-6_141 DO - 10.2991/978-2-38476-062-6_141 ID - Tang2023 ER -