The Advocacy Subjects of Third-Party Logistics Contract Void

DOI

10.2991/ssemse-15.2015.539How to use a DOI?

Keywords

third-party logistics contract; contract void; advocacy; subject

Abstract

Who shall put forward or propose the third-party logistics contract void, about which the three Contract Laws issued have no provisions, this shows it is a legislative gap or knotty problem. This document aims to draw a conclusion that in China one party with logistics contract benefit loss shall put forward the third-party logistics contract void through analysis according to foreign legal provisions and legal basis; After disputing party’s lawsuit, the court can review the third-party logistics contract ex officio and confirm the third-party logistics contract invalid, without the restrictions whether the disputing party puts forward third-party logistics contract void, so the court can be regarded as the proposer of third-party logistics contract void.

Copyright

© 2015, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Xiuli Tan
AU  - Bayi Guan
PY  - 2015/11
DA  - 2015/11
TI  - The Advocacy Subjects of Third-Party Logistics Contract Void
BT  - Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Social Science, Education Management and Sports Education
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 2115
EP  - 2118
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/ssemse-15.2015.539
DO  - 10.2991/ssemse-15.2015.539
ID  - Tan2015/11
ER  -