Limits to applicability of types of rationality in legal activities

DOI

10.2991/ismge-19.2019.31How to use a DOI?

Keywords

types of rationality, judge, lawyer, legislator, legal thinking, levels of legal knowledge

Abstract

The article attempts to establish the limits of applicability for distinguishing between types of rationality in legal activity on the basis of philosophical criteria. The authors revealed differences in thinking of a legal official, judge and, legislator, due to the peculiarities of their professional activities. Based on V. Stepina's classification of rationality types, the authors of the article try to prove that various specialties in the legal profession respectively require their representatives thinking at the level of classical, non-classical and post-non-classical rationality. Recognition of this distinction will allow substantiating the approaches to training lawyers, as well as explaining different views on the concept of law.

Copyright

© 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Marina Davydova
AU  - Dmitry Zykov
PY  - 2019/07
DA  - 2019/07
TI  - Limits to applicability of types of rationality  in legal activities
BT  - Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific Practical Conference "The Individual and Society in the Modern Geopolitical Environment" (ISMGE 2019)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 156
EP  - 161
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/ismge-19.2019.31
DO  - 10.2991/ismge-19.2019.31
ID  - Davydova2019/07
ER  -