The Development of the Border Trade between the Chinese Soviet Republic and the White Area from 1931 to 1934: A Case Study of the Tungsten Ore Trade
- DOI
- 10.2991/assehr.k.220504.220How to use a DOI?
- Keywords
- Border Trade; Chinese Soviet Republic; Economic Blockade
- Abstract
This paper studies the border trade development between the Chinese Soviet Republic (CSR) and the White Area from 1931 to 1934. At that time, Kuomintang (K.M.T.) and the Communist Party of China (CPC) were in a hostile state. The CPC was weak and could only survive in the mountainous areas at the border of Fujian and Jiangxi provinces. The lack of materials in CSR forced the CPC to develop border trade. The importance of this paper’s topic selection lies in exploring the formation and development of the CPC’s economic construction thought from the border trade issues in CSR. This paper mainly uses periodicals, statistical data, memoirs, and local chronicles materials to examine the border trade of CSR and pay attention to the influence of local warlords on foreign trade. Finally, this paper concludes that the formation of the guiding ideology of the Communist Party of China’s economic construction began with the development of China’s CSR border trade in 1931-1934. This article also expands the research on the history of the Communist Party of China and the reasons for the vigorous development of the contemporary Chinese Communist Party, which has a certain era significance and contemporary value.
- Copyright
- © 2022 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Wenjie Luo PY - 2022 DA - 2022/06/01 TI - The Development of the Border Trade between the Chinese Soviet Republic and the White Area from 1931 to 1934: A Case Study of the Tungsten Ore Trade BT - Proceedings of the 2022 8th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2022) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 1210 EP - 1217 SN - 2352-5398 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220504.220 DO - 10.2991/assehr.k.220504.220 ID - Luo2022 ER -