Similarities and Differences between China and EU in Similar Cases

DOI

10.2991/ichssr-18.2018.119How to use a DOI?

Keywords

horizontal monopoly agreement; overcapacity; Similarities and differences; Shanxi Electricity Case; Synthetic Fibers Case

Abstract

This article selects two cases, namely the first case of Shanxi Electricity Anti-monopoly Law Enforcement (hereinafter referred to as "Shanxi Electricity Case") and the EU Commission of Synthetic Fibers (hereinafter referred to as "Synthetic Fibers Case"). Both of these cases involve horizontal monopoly agreements and defenses of overcapacity. The following two cases will be analyzed and compared.This article will analyze and compare the two cases, comparing the similarities and differences between the two law enforcement decisions on the facts of the case, the main points of the referee, the defense opinions of both parties and the conclusion of the judgment, analyzing the reasons for the similarities and differences, and providing references for the handling of similar cases in the future.

Copyright

© 2018, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Shanshan Su
AU  - Lanfang Fei
PY  - 2018/05
DA  - 2018/05
TI  - Similarities and Differences between China and EU in Similar Cases
BT  - Proceedings of the 2018 4th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2018)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 622
EP  - 626
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/ichssr-18.2018.119
DO  - 10.2991/ichssr-18.2018.119
ID  - Su2018/05
ER  -