Position of Arbitration Clause in Relation to Absolute Competence in Bankruptcy Disputes
Authors
Rahayu Hartini, A.A.A. Ngurah Tini Rusmini Gorda
Corresponding Author
Rahayu Hartini
Available Online 17 September 2020.
- DOI
- 10.2991/assehr.k.200917.005How to use a DOI?
- Keywords
- Arbitration, Bankruptcy, Contract legal principles, Pacta sunt servanda
- Abstract
During the validity of Law No. 37 of 2004 (2004-2013), out of 5 bankruptcy cases, all decisions stating that the Commercial Court is authorized to settle bankruptcy cases based on Article 303 of Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy. Although the substance of Article 303 is contrary to the legal principle of the contract “Pacta sunt servanda”. Article 303 raises deviations in the principle of systematization law, which will weaken law enforcement in Indonesia, and can even cause the loss of legal principles as a rule of law at the basic level of norms.
- Copyright
- © 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Rahayu Hartini AU - A.A.A. Ngurah Tini Rusmini Gorda PY - 2020 DA - 2020/09/17 TI - Position of Arbitration Clause in Relation to Absolute Competence in Bankruptcy Disputes BT - Proceedings of the Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution International Conference (ADRIC 2019) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 21 EP - 24 SN - 2352-5398 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200917.005 DO - 10.2991/assehr.k.200917.005 ID - Hartini2020 ER -