Proceedings of the 2022 ‘AISYIYAH International Conference on Health and Medical Sciences (A-HMS 2022)

Differences of Radiation Dose and Image Contrast on Anode Heel Effect Application with Thoracal Examination with Cathode Location in Proximal and Distal

Authors
Widya Mufia1, *, Fani Susanto2, Redha Okta Silfina3
1Faculty of Health Sciences, ‘Aisyiyah Yogyakarta University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
2Faculty of Health Sciences, Muhammadiyah Purwokerto University, Purwokerto, Indonesia
3DIII Radiology Adisutjipto Air Force Helath Polytechnic, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
*Corresponding author. Email: wmufida1@gmail.com
Corresponding Author
Widya Mufia
Available Online 27 July 2023.
DOI
10.2991/978-94-6463-190-6_38How to use a DOI?
Keywords
anode heel effect; thoracolumbar
Abstract

On radiographic examination of the vertebrae, the difference in the thickness of the thoracic vertebrae causes differences in the intensity of radiation reaching the detector so that the image quality and the dose received by the patient is different in the superior and inferior parts. The difference in radiation intensity can be reduced by using the heel effect anode technique. Anode Heel Effect is the intensity of radiation emitted from the cathode end of the x-ray tube is greater than that emitted at the anode end. The arrangement of the anode and cathode location is rarely considered so that the anode is more often in the inferior part resulting in a low density radiograph of the inferior part. In addition to affecting the image, of course, the anode hell effect affects the radiation dose produced because of the different density intensities. The research design is descriptive research with quantitative data types. The location of data collection was carried out at the Radiology Laboratory of the University of ‘Aisyiyah Yogyakarta. In this study, the whole body anthropomorphic panthom was used. The results of measurements of radiation dose and contrast with 70 kV and 10.5 mAs settings, obtained a higher dose and contrast value on thoracolumbar radiographic examination with the location of the cathode with an average dose rate of 55.93 µGy/s whereas if the cathode is in the distal the average radiation dose rate is 49.66 µGy/s. This is due to the anatomical shape of the thoracolumbar itself which is larger in the distal part than proximal so that the radiation intensity that reaches the detector is greater.

Copyright
© 2023 The Author(s)
Open Access
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Download article (PDF)

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2022 ‘AISYIYAH International Conference on Health and Medical Sciences (A-HMS 2022)
Series
Advances in Health Sciences Research
Publication Date
27 July 2023
ISBN
978-94-6463-190-6
ISSN
2468-5739
DOI
10.2991/978-94-6463-190-6_38How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2023 The Author(s)
Open Access
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - Widya Mufia
AU  - Fani Susanto
AU  - Redha Okta Silfina
PY  - 2023
DA  - 2023/07/27
TI  - Differences of Radiation Dose and Image Contrast on Anode Heel Effect Application with Thoracal Examination with Cathode Location in Proximal and Distal
BT  - Proceedings of the 2022 ‘AISYIYAH International Conference on Health and Medical Sciences (A-HMS 2022)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 299
EP  - 303
SN  - 2468-5739
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-190-6_38
DO  - 10.2991/978-94-6463-190-6_38
ID  - Mufia2023
ER  -