Artery Research

Volume 16, Issue C, December 2016, Pages 98 - 99

PO-36 EFFECTS OF FIXED VERSUS AUTO-TITRATING CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE ON VASCULAR FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH RESISTANT HYPERTENSION AND OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA

Authors
Karen Tran1, R.J. Kimoff2, 3, S.S. Daskalopoulou2
1Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
2Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
3Respiratory Division and Sleep Laboratory, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Available Online 24 November 2016.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2016.08.039How to use a DOI?
Abstract

Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common cause of resistant hypertension. We investigated the effects of 2 modalities of positive airway pressure; fixed continuous airway pressure (fCPAP) versus auto-titrating positive airway pressure (APAP) on arterial function in subjects with resistant hypertension and severe OSA.

Objective: To assess in participants with resistant hypertension and OSA the effects of fCPAP vs. APAP on 24h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), as well as sleep indices, heart rate variability (HRV), and arterial stiffness.

Methods: We randomized 14 subjects (56±11 years, baseline SBP and DBP 137±10 and 77±12 mm Hg, respectively, apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] 58±31 events/h, Epworth sleepiness scale 7±5) to fCPAP or APAP for 6 weeks, followed by crossover to the other modality for another 6 weeks. Overnight polysomnography, 24h ABPM, HRV, and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV, arterial stiffness ‘gold-standard’ measure) were measured at baseline and after each intervention period.

Results: fCPAP and APAP were associated with similar improvements in sleep quality, AHI and oxygen desaturation indices, while the nadir SpO2 was significantly higher with fCPAP than APAP (z=−2.251, p=0.03). There were no significant effects of either modality on central BP or 24h ABPM, likely due to controlled BP at baseline. Both fCPAP and APAP improved cfPWV compared to baseline, (fCPAP, p=0.017; APAP, p=0.056), suggesting that their effects are BP independent. CPAP significantly decreased HR and HRV, whereas APAP had no effect.

Conclusions: No differences in vascular function was observed with treatment with fCPAP or APAP, but there is some suggestion that fCPAP is associated with improved measures of arterial health, i.e.: cfPWV and HR. The effects of fCPAP on arterial stiffness may be independent of BP and potentially mediated by changes in sympathovagal activity. Our results of mild favorable effects of fCPAP need to be confirmed in larger studies.

Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
16 - C
Pages
98 - 99
Publication Date
2016/11/24
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2016.08.039How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Karen Tran
AU  - R.J. Kimoff
AU  - S.S. Daskalopoulou
PY  - 2016
DA  - 2016/11/24
TI  - PO-36 EFFECTS OF FIXED VERSUS AUTO-TITRATING CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE ON VASCULAR FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH RESISTANT HYPERTENSION AND OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 98
EP  - 99
VL  - 16
IS  - C
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2016.08.039
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2016.08.039
ID  - Tran2016
ER  -