13.7 RENAL DENERVATION IN TREATMENT RESISTANT HYPERTENSION: EFFECTS ON CORONARY FLOW RESERVE AND FOREARM DILATION CAPACITY. A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLINDED, SHAM-CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.artres.2016.10.116How to use a DOI?
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.
Background: Microvascular impairment is well documented in hypertension. In this ReSET1 sub-study we investigated the effects of renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) on coronary flow reserve (CFR) and coronary- and forearm minimum vascular resistance (C-Rmin and F-Rmin) in patients with resistant hypertension.
Methods: A randomised, single centre, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial in 58 patients with resistant hypertension randomised to RDN or SHAM. Inclusion criteria: ASBP-day > 145 mmHg following stable antihypertensive treatment and 2 weeks of compliance registration. RDN was performed with the unipolar Medtronic Flex catheter (Medtronic, California, USA). CFR and C-Rmin were determined with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography and F-Rmin with venous occlusion plethysmography at baseline and six-months follow-up.
Results: Baseline mean 24-h ambulatory BP was 111±1 mmHg (RDN, n=29) and 111±2 mmHg (SHAM, n=29). Similar reductions in MAP were seen at six-months follow up (−3.5±2.0 vs −3.2±1.8, p=0.92). Baseline CFR was 2.9±0.1 (RDN) and 2.4±0.1 (SHAM) with no significant change at follow-up (0.2±0.2 vs. −0.1±0.2, P=0.57). C-Rmin was 1.9±0.3 (RDN) and 2.7±0.6 (SHAM) (mmHg min/ml pr. 100 g LVM) and unchanged (0.3±0.5 vs. −0.4±0.8, P=0.48). F-Rmin was 3.6±0.2 (RDN) and 3.6±0.3 (SHAM) (mmHg min/ml pr. 100 ml tissue) and unchanged at follow-up (0.6±0.3 vs. 0.1±0.2, P=0.17). There was a tendency toward increased baseline LVMI in the SHAM-group (121±7 (SHAM) vs. 108±3 (RDN) g/m2, P=0.08), but with proportional change at follow-up (−4±7 vs. 3±5, P=0.38).
Conclusion: RDN had no significant effect on CFR, C-Rmin and F-Rmin. Thus, data does not support microvascular improvement following RDN in resistant hypertension.
Cite this article
TY - JOUR AU - Morten Engholm AU - Jannik B. Bertelsen AU - Ole N. Mathiassen AU - Henrik Vase AU - Jesper N. Bech AU - Anne P. Schroeder AU - Ole Lederballe AU - Hans Rickers AU - Christian D. Peters AU - Ulla Kampmannf AU - Per L. Poulsen AU - Sten Langfeldt AU - Gratien Andersen AU - Klavs W. Hansen AU - Erling B. Pedersen AU - Jens F. Lassen AU - Hans E. Boetker AU - Niels H. Buus AU - Anne Kaltoft AU - Kent L. Christensen PY - 2016 DA - 2016/11/24 TI - 13.7 RENAL DENERVATION IN TREATMENT RESISTANT HYPERTENSION: EFFECTS ON CORONARY FLOW RESERVE AND FOREARM DILATION CAPACITY. A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLINDED, SHAM-CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL JO - Artery Research SP - 81 EP - 81 VL - 16 IS - C SN - 1876-4401 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2016.10.116 DO - 10.1016/j.artres.2016.10.116 ID - Engholm2016 ER -