Artery Research

Volume 16, Issue C, December 2016, Pages 72 - 72

10.5 COMPARISON OF ARTERIAL STIFFNESS ASSESSED BY POPMÈTRE® WITH ARTERIAL STIFFNESS ASSESSED BY APPLANATION TONOMETRY: A CLINICAL STUDY

Authors
Hasan Obeid1, Hakim Khettab1, Pierre Boutouyrie1, Stephane Laurent1, Magid Hallab2, 3
1Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
2Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France
3Axelife and University Hospital of Nantes, France
Available Online 24 November 2016.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2016.10.083How to use a DOI?
Abstract

Background: Large artery stiffness is recognized as a strong, independent marker of cardiovascular risk, mainly through aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). pOpmètre® is a new non-invasive method, which estimates aortic PWV through finger-toe (FT) wave analysis. In a previous study, Alivon et al. have shown an acceptable correlation (r2 = 0.43 for PWV) between pOpmètre® and the reference method Sphygmocor. However this study led to the necessity to optimize the algorithm and the procedures because of the presence of several outliers involving mainly obese and elderly subjects.

Materials and Methods: The pOpmètre® has 2 photodiodes sensors, positioned on the finger and on the toe. A particular attention was drawn on positioning of the toe sensor so that the pulp was in contact with the photodiode. Different signal processing chains were applied and no cut-off value was used for pulse height. Applanation tonometry was performed for CF PWV measurements.

Results: 45 subjects were included: 18 healthy subjects and 27 patients with essential hypertension aged 32± 7 years and 58 ±18 years respectively. The correlation between FT PWV and CF PWV was good and significant (r2 = 0.77 p<0.0001). A better correlation was found in terms of transit time (r2 = 0.83 p<0.0001). The standard deviation of the difference was 0.87 m/s versus 6.73 ms, classifying the device as good agreement with reference (Wilkinson, ARTERY RES 2010).

Conclusion: pOpmètre® with optimized algorithm and procedure qualifies as excellent agreement with the reference technique for PWV assessment, however, outcome studies must confirm the value of this new device.

Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

References

1.ALIVON Maureen et al., ARTERY research archives. Validation study of pOpmètre, 2015.
Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
16 - C
Pages
72 - 72
Publication Date
2016/11/24
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2016.10.083How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hasan Obeid
AU  - Hakim Khettab
AU  - Pierre Boutouyrie
AU  - Stephane Laurent
AU  - Magid Hallab
PY  - 2016
DA  - 2016/11/24
TI  - 10.5 COMPARISON OF ARTERIAL STIFFNESS ASSESSED BY POPMÈTRE® WITH ARTERIAL STIFFNESS ASSESSED BY APPLANATION TONOMETRY: A CLINICAL STUDY
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 72
EP  - 72
VL  - 16
IS  - C
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2016.10.083
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2016.10.083
ID  - Obeid2016
ER  -