Artery Research

Volume 24, Issue C, December 2018, Pages 62 - 62

PERIPHERAL BLOOD FLOW REGULATION IN RESPONSE TO SYMPATHETIC STIMULATION IN INDIVIDUALS WITH DOWN SYNDROME

Authors
Thessa I.M. Hilgenkamp1, Sang Ouk Wee2, Tracy Baynard1, Bo Fernhall1
1University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
2California State University San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA Department, Chicago, USA
Available Online 4 December 2018.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.004How to use a DOI?
Abstract

Background: Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) experience autonomic dysfunction, with reduced sympathetic and parasympathetic control. This results in alterations in resting heart rate and blood pressure and attenuated responses to sympathoexcitatory stimuli. It is unknown to what extent this impacts the regulation of peripheral blood flow in response to sympathetic stimuli, which is an important prerequisite to exercise and perform work.

Purpose: To investigate differences in peripheral blood flow regulation in response to lower body negative pressure (LBNP) between individuals with and without DS. Methods: Participants (n = 10 males with DS and n = 11 male controls, mean age 23.7 years ± 3.2) underwent 5 min of LBNP stimulations (−20 mmHg), after resting supine for 10 min. One minute steady state blood pressure and blood flow at baseline, LBNP, and 5 min recovery were obtained for analysis. Mean flow velocity and arterial diameters were recorded with ultrasonography; foreram blood flow (FBF), shear rate and forearm vascular conductance (FVC) were calculated using brachial blood pressure measured right before ultrasound recordings. Results: Participants with DS responded differently (consistent with reduced vasoconstrictive control) to the LBNP stimulus (significant ConditionxGroup interaction effect) for mean velocity (p = 0.003), FBF (p = 0.008), shear rate (p = 0.004) and FVC (p = 0.017), compared to participants without DS (see table).

Conclusion: Young males with DS exhibit reduced peripheral blood flow regulation of blood flow in response to LBNP compared to controls, indicating a blunted sympathetic control of blood flow. Further research is necessary to explore the impact of these findings on exercise and work capacity.

Baseline LBNP Recovery DS Control DS Control DS Control MAP 90 ± 13 88 ± 10 85 ± 12 87 ± 10 92 ± 11 85 ± 10 Diameter (cm) 0.36 ± 0.05 0.43 ± 0.05 0.37 ± 0.05 0.43 ± 0.7 0.37 ± 0.04 0.42 ± 0.06 Mean velocity (cm/sec) 13 ± 7 21 ± 10 15 ± 7 17 ± 5 16 ± 9 16 ± 8 FBF (ml/min) 91 ± 64 176 ± 80 104 ± 67 146 ± 47 114 ± 91 138 ± 74 Shear Rate (sec-1) 20 ± 12 35 ± ± 16 23 ± 12 29 ± 8 25 ± 17 28 ± 14 FVC (ml/min/100 mmHg) 101 ± 67 203 ± 95 124 ± 84 171 ± 63 125 ± 101 162 ± 81.

Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
24 - C
Pages
62 - 62
Publication Date
2018/12/04
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.004How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Thessa I.M. Hilgenkamp
AU  - Sang Ouk Wee
AU  - Tracy Baynard
AU  - Bo Fernhall
PY  - 2018
DA  - 2018/12/04
TI  - PERIPHERAL BLOOD FLOW REGULATION IN RESPONSE TO SYMPATHETIC STIMULATION IN INDIVIDUALS WITH DOWN SYNDROME
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 62
EP  - 62
VL  - 24
IS  - C
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.004
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.004
ID  - Hilgenkamp2018
ER  -