Artery Research

Volume 8, Issue 4, December 2014, Pages 124 - 125

2.6 NON-INVASIVE ESTIMATION OF EXERCISE CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE BY RADIAL TONOMETRY MAY BE UNDERESTIMATED DUE TO BRACHIAL-TO-RADIAL-SYSTOLIC-BLOOD-PRESSURE-AMPLIFICATION AND IS RELATED TO UPPER LIMB BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY

Authors
D. Picone, R. Climie, M. Keske, J. Sharman
University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
Available Online 4 November 2014.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2014.09.062How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Objectives: Both central blood pressure (BP) and light-moderate exercise BP are independently associated with cardiovascular risk, and measuring central BP during exercise may have clinical relevance. Brachial-to-radial-systolic-blood-pressure-amplification (B-R-SBPAMP) could influence the accuracy of central SBP estimation by radial tonometry during exercise. This study aimed to determine the influence of light-moderate exercise on B-R-SBPAMP and consequent central SBP estimation. Independent correlates of B-R-SBPAMP were also explored.

Methods: Sixty healthy participants (39±16 years, 50% male) underwent testing during light-moderate intensity (40W, 50RPM) semi-recumbent cycling. SBP was identified by brachial and radial ultrasound (1st Doppler flow inflection = 1st Korotkoff sound during cuff deflation). Haemodynamics were recorded by ultrasound and tonometry. Bra-Rad-SBPAmp was defined as radial minus brachial SBP.

Result: Exercise radial SBP was significantly higher than brachial SBP (144±21 versus 134±17 mmHg; p<0.001). Exercise Bra-Rad-SBPAmp was 10±11 mmHg and increased with advancing age (r=0.360, p=0.005). Exercise central SBP was significantly higher when radial tonometry was calibrated with radial SBP (accounting for Bra-Rad-SBPAmp) versus brachial SBP (117±16 versus 110±13 mmHg, p<0.001). Low brachial peak flow velocity relative to radial velocity was negatively associated with exercise B-R-SBPAmp (r=−0.439, p=0.001), independent of age, sex, heart rate and mean arterial pressure (β=−0.389, adjusted R2=0.273, p=0.003).

Conclusions: Significant Bra-Rad-SBPAmp exists during light-moderate exercise. This will result in underestimation of central SBP unless Bra-Rad-SBPAmp is considered and is influenced by variation in peak blood flow velocity magnitude between the brachial and radial arteries.

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
8 - 4
Pages
124 - 125
Publication Date
2014/11/04
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2014.09.062How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - D. Picone
AU  - R. Climie
AU  - M. Keske
AU  - J. Sharman
PY  - 2014
DA  - 2014/11/04
TI  - 2.6 NON-INVASIVE ESTIMATION OF EXERCISE CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE BY RADIAL TONOMETRY MAY BE UNDERESTIMATED DUE TO BRACHIAL-TO-RADIAL-SYSTOLIC-BLOOD-PRESSURE-AMPLIFICATION AND IS RELATED TO UPPER LIMB BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 124
EP  - 125
VL  - 8
IS  - 4
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2014.09.062
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2014.09.062
ID  - Picone2014
ER  -