Juridical Analysis of Legal Protection of Ownership of Rights to Land That Have Been Purchase (Certificate Number 3131)

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.220404.097How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Certificate; Legal Protection; Land Law

Abstract

The need for housing is a basic need of every person. Talking about housing is certainly related to land and buildings. For this reason, many people are not willing to lose their rights to their land and buildings. As an example of a dispute discussed in this thesis, namely an incident where the ownership of a plot of land and buildings is transferred through a process of buying and selling transactions that have been mutually agreed upon and carried out in the presence of an authorized official. But then the seller does not hand over his ownership to the rightful buyer. The author uses descriptive normative research methods supported by qualitative research types, deductive techniques (general and special). Research data from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. In addition, it is supported by the results of interviews with related parties and other parties who are sources of information. Based on the research, it was concluded that in the dispute that occurred between Jerry Sumitra and Muchtasor, the ownership certificate number 3131 was in accordance with applicable regulations so that it had the power and legal protection. As the holder of land rights, Jerry Sumitra is legal in the eyes of the law, only physical control has not been obtained due to a default by Muchtasor who did not fulfill his obligations in leasing the object. In addition, Muchtasor’s unlawful act was detrimental in that he did not return the object of the lease after the lease expired. Jerry Sumitra reported Muchtasor’s actions to the police. In addition, they should also submit an application to the local District Court for assistance in taking over the ownership and ask for compensation for the losses suffered by Muchtasor’s actions. The author concludes that a process of buying and selling land and buildings should be accompanied by a cautious attitude. In addition to agreeing, it is also necessary to investigate the status/history of the land purchased, and at the same time to carry out clear and tangible levering/handover of the object. This is intended to prevent misuse from irresponsible parties, such as in the dispute between Jerry Sumitra and Muchtasor.

Copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Vienny Tirta
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/04/21
TI  - Juridical Analysis of Legal Protection of Ownership of Rights to Land That Have Been Purchase (Certificate Number 3131)
BT  - Proceedings of the 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2021)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 615
EP  - 622
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220404.097
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.220404.097
ID  - Tirta2022
ER  -