Juridicial Review of Restitution For Children Impacted by Criminal Act Based on: Government Regulation Number 43 Of 2017 Concerning the Implementation of Restitution For Children to Become Criminal Victims

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.201209.122How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Restitution, Compensation, Children or Minor, Criminal Act or Criminal Offense

Abstract

The issue of criminal crime because the times are increasingly rife. This raises a priority for the people and also the government, especially criminal crimes against Children or Minors. Deficiencies of the Law governing penalties for the perpetrators of those crimes, the government made efforts to issue regulations or laws that are expected to cut back crime from these crimes, namely Government Regulations of the Republic of Indonesia Number 43 of 2017 which regulates the rights for a restitution of child victims of a criminal offense within the sort of compensation for rights within the style of money or materially because of the responsibility of the perpetrators of the crime. The results of the study showed that the government regulations have provided regulations on the rights of child victims of crime, the procedure for filing restitution, and therefore the procedure for granting restitution to children who were victims of criminal acts or their heirs. There is a deficiency of this regulation that has to be improved, namely regarding criminal liability of perpetrators or criminal imposition of restitution that cannot be paid, if there are alternative regulations for perpetrators / defendants / convicts unable to require responsibility for implementing court decisions that have permanent legal force regarding the implementation of restitution. And it’s expected that within the future, a restitution rule is made within the matter of the law in the order that its position as a law is stronger. namely regarding criminal liability of perpetrators or criminal imposition of restitution that cannot be paid, if there are alternative regulations for perpetrators / defendants / convicts unable to require responsibility for implementing court decisions that have permanent legal force regarding the implementation of restitution. And it’s expected that within the future, a restitution rule is made within the matter of the law in the order that its position as a law is stronger. namely regarding criminal liability of perpetrators or criminal imposition of restitution that cannot be paid, if there are alternative regulations for perpetrators / defendants / convicts unable to require responsibility for implementing court decisions that have permanent legal force regarding the implementation of restitution. And it’s expected that within the future, a restitution rule is made within the matter of the law in the order that its position as a law is stronger.

Copyright

© 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Rahaditya
AU  - Kenneth Sunarto
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/12/12
TI  - Juridicial Review of Restitution For Children Impacted by Criminal Act Based on: Government Regulation Number 43 Of 2017 Concerning the Implementation of Restitution For Children to Become Criminal Victims
BT  - Proceedings of the 2nd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2020)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 773
EP  - 782
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.122
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.201209.122
ID  - 2020
ER  -