The Research on the EU Investment Court System

DOI

10.2991/sschd-18.2019.78How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Investor-State Dispute Settlement, Investment Court System.

Abstract

In view of the inherent shortcomings of the current investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): 1) serious interest imbalance; 2) investor abuse of the right to appeal; 3) insufficient transparency; 4) lack of consistency in the ruling, EU's new round of trade agreements In the negotiation, the Investment Court System (ICS) was proposed to reform the traditional ISDS. This paper sorts out this new model and analyzes the innovation of the investment court model: 1) the balanced protection of the host country's regulatory power; 2) Strengthen the legality and impartiality of the arbitral award; 3) ensuring consistency of arbitral awards; 4) adding mediation procedures. Combining with the international investment environment, analyze the problems existing in the investment court model, exploring the feasibility of the EU's implementation of the global investment court model to resolve investment disputes.

Copyright

© 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Kai QIAN
PY  - 2019/01
DA  - 2019/01
TI  - The Research on the EU Investment Court System
BT  - Proceedings of the 4th Annual International Conference on Social Science and Contemporary Humanity Development (SSCHD 2018)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 426
EP  - 429
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/sschd-18.2019.78
DO  - 10.2991/sschd-18.2019.78
ID  - QIAN2019/01
ER  -