Study on the effect of different muscle fatigue recovery methods on muscle stiffness recovery

DOI

10.2991/saeme-17.2017.104How to use a DOI?

Keywords

muscle stiffness; muscle fatigue; muscle recovery; concentric contraction; eccentric contraction.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of several passive recovery (PR), active recovery (AR), vibration recovery (VR) and cryotherapy recovery (CR) on the recovery of muscle stiffness (MS). 20 healthy male college students were enrolled in the study. MS of the biceps brachii of the non-handedness was measured. The differences and recovery effects of MS at different detection time points were tested by one-way repeated measures ANOVA. The results indicated that the muscle stiffness in different time points did not change significantly, the reason for the fatigue movement in a short period of time on muscle stiffness caused no obvious difference, or is this study using the sensitivity of muscle tension is not sensitive.

Copyright

© 2017, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Fan Zhang
AU  - Aimin Zhou
PY  - 2017/07
DA  - 2017/07
TI  - Study on the effect of different muscle fatigue recovery methods on muscle stiffness recovery
BT  - Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Sports, Arts, Education and Management Engineering (SAEME 2017)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 465
EP  - 468
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/saeme-17.2017.104
DO  - 10.2991/saeme-17.2017.104
ID  - Zhang2017/07
ER  -