Analysis of Laboratory Use in Doing Scientific Work in Elementary Schools

DOI

10.2991/978-2-38476-152-4_186How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Scientific Work; Elementary Science Learning; real laboratory

Abstract

This research was conducted with the aim of describing the use of real laboratories in carrying out scientific work on science learning in elementary schools. The method used is qualitative research. The research subjects were carried out in 46 elementary schools in the Surabaya area. The data sources for this action research include students, teachers, learning outcomes documents, and the learning process. Data collection techniques are carried out in the following way: Interview methods are carried out with teachers and students who carry out the learning. The Observational Method is a way of collecting data by direct observation and systematic recording of the object to be studied. Data analysis techniques according to Miles and Huberman include data reduction, namely making an abstraction of all data obtained from all field notes resulting from observations, interviews and document review. Presentation of data, namely a collection of structured information that gives the possibility of drawing conclusions in taking action. Based on the results of the study, it was shown that 67.5% of elementary schools did not have laboratories. occurred as many as 64.7% of respondents said there was no laboratory. 95.5% of respondents stated that they continued to carry out practicums with various obstacles, the first obstacle was 60.9% stated time constraints, 58.7% stated a lack of tools and materials, and 52.2% stated that there was no laboratory, namely a collection of structured information that gives the possibility of drawing conclusions in taking action. Based on the results of the study, it was shown that 67.5% of elementary schools did not have laboratories. occurred as many as 64.7% of respondents said there was no laboratory. 95.5% of respondents stated that they continued to carry out practicums with various obstacles, the first obstacle was 60.9% stated time constraints, 58.7% stated a lack of tools and materials, and 52.2% stated that there was no laboratory, namely a collection of structured information that gives the possibility of drawing conclusions in taking action. Based on the results of the study, it was shown that 67.5% of elementary schools did not have laboratories. occurred as many as 4.7% of respondents said there was no laboratory. 95.5% of respondents stated that they continued to carry out practicums with various obstacles, the first obstacle was 60.9% stated time constraints, 58.7% stated a lack of tools and materials, and 52.2% stated that there was no laboratory.

Copyright

© 2023 The Author(s)

Open Access

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Farida Istianah
PY  - 2023
DA  - 2023/12/19
TI  - Analysis of Laboratory Use in Doing Scientific Work in Elementary Schools
BT  - Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2023 (IJCAH 2023)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 1843
EP  - 1851
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-152-4_186
DO  - 10.2991/978-2-38476-152-4_186
ID  - Istianah2023
ER  -