Argumentative Indicators in Mata Najwa Talk Show Pragmadialectical Study

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.211223.033How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Argumentative indicators; Pragmadialectical; Mata Najwa

Abstract

This article aims to find indicators of argumentation contained in the Mata Najwa talk show using pragmadialectical studies. The data used in this study was from a debate speech at the Mata Najwa event on the topic “Beres-Beres Kursi Menkes.” The method used was descriptive qualitative. The data collection technique used the listening and note-taking technique. A pragmadialectical analysis study was employed in this study, and it is based on four meta-theoretical principles (functionalization, socialization, externalization, and dialectification). The method of testing the validity of the data used data source triangulation techniques and theoretical triangulation. The results show that the argumentation indicators found in the Mata Najwa talk show the speakers’ expressions. The argumentation indicator was the distribution of speech acts that occur at each stage of the argument. The argumentation stages are the confrontation stage, the opening stage, the argument stage, and the closing stage. At each location, it was found that the speech acts used by the debate participants were assertive, directive, commissive, and declarative speech acts.

Copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.

Open Access

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Kamariah Kamariah
AU  - Kisyani Laksono
AU  - Agusniar D. Savitri
AU  - Suhartono Suhartono
AU  - Darni Darni
AU  - Udjang Pairin
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021/12/24
TI  - Argumentative Indicators in Mata Najwa Talk Show Pragmadialectical Study
BT  - Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2021 (IJCAH 2021)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 183
EP  - 189
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211223.033
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.211223.033
ID  - Kamariah2021
ER  -