Research on the Relationship Between Civil Social Security and Government Work Evaluation

Based on CSS2019 Data Analysis

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.210407.126How to use a DOI?

Keywords

citizen, social security participation, social security satisfaction, government work evaluation

Abstract

Previous studies in the academic circle have shown that civil social security and government work evaluation are closely related. However, there is no unified answer to the inner relationship between the two. Based on this, this study uses data from the Comprehensive Survey of Social Conditions in China (CSS2019) and uses statistical methods such as descriptive statistics, T-test, and multiple regression analysis to analyze the influence of citizens’ participation in social security and social security satisfaction on government work evaluation. The results found that citizens’ participation in pension insurance, medical insurance, and urban and rural subsistence allowances positively affected their government work evaluation, and participation in unemployment insurance and work-related injury insurance negatively affected their government work evaluation; there was a significant difference between social security satisfaction and government work evaluation It is positively correlated. The higher the social security satisfaction at all levels of pension, medical care, employment, housing, and subsistence allowances, the higher the evaluation of government work. Based on the research results, make policy recommendations.

Copyright

© 2021, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Xiaowei Liang
AU  - Jiahao Lan
AU  - Bijun Wu
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021/04/08
TI  - Research on the Relationship Between Civil Social Security and Government Work Evaluation
BT  - Proceedings of the 2021 6th International Conference on Social Sciences and Economic Development (ICSSED 2021)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 653
EP  - 660
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210407.126
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.210407.126
ID  - Liang2021
ER  -