Transnational Corruption and Its Impact on Indonesian Jurisdiction

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.201209.266How to use a DOI?

Keywords

anti-corruption, jurisdiction, transnational crime

Abstract

As a state of law, all law enforcement processes in Indonesia are limited by sovereignty for trans-border crimes that one of them is corruption. Corruption case is as part of transnational crimes that cannot be underestimated. The legal vacuum that occurs in Indonesia has an impact on the difficulty of prosecuting the perpetrators of corruption crimes as part of Indonesia’s criminal jurisdiction. The formulations of the problems used in this legal research are: (1). Legal accountability for perpetrators of cross-border corruption; (2). International legal mechanisms and national law in the eradication of transnational corruption crimes. The results of this research are: (1) There is a need for joint cooperative action to crack down on corruption crimes across borders in accordance with UNCAC and UNTOC, considering that corruption crimes are a common problem with all countries in the world. (2). Indonesia needs to adopt and recognize various types of corruption crimes at UNCAC in the revision of the new Corruption Act. As well, the emergence of an agreement of all countries in the world to create universal jurisdiction over cross-border corruption crimes in the International Criminal Court (ICC), as a crime under the jurisdiction of the ICC. In particular, amendments to the 1998 Rome Statute.

Copyright

© 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Satria Unggul Wicaksana Prakasa
AU  - Basuki Babussalam
AU  - Agus Supriyo
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/12/14
TI  - Transnational Corruption and Its Impact on Indonesian Jurisdiction
BT  - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Law, Government and Social Justice (ICOLGAS 2020)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 43
EP  - 53
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.266
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.201209.266
ID  - Prakasa2020
ER  -