Conceptual Biotechnology Measured by Using a Two-Tier Multiple Test

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.200129.069How to use a DOI?

Keywords

biotechnology, two tier multiple test

Abstract

Biotechnology is a concept that combines biology and technology. The concept of Biotechnology in this research is divided into 4 based on the Rainbow Code of Biotechnology (RCB). This research aimed to measure the concept of biotechnology using a Two-Tier Multiple Test (TTMC). This research consists of two methods, namely qualitative and quantitative methods. TTMC was developed using a procedure defined by Borg and Gall. TTMC consists of 20 questions and tested to 137 students to collect data. Based on the research findings, it can be concluded that TTMC assessment instruments developed is feasible and meets the criteria as a good question with the content validity (CV) of 1.00, an average score of the reliability test of 0.92 of a very high category, the level of difficulty of 79.2% with a moderate category and 16.7% with a difficult category, and the discriminating power of 18.7% with a very good category and 39.6% with a good category. The TTMC instrument developed for measuring biotechnology material is sufficient to measure understanding of biotechnology with 41.6% of consistency. The research results show that the two-tier tests are effective in determining the students’ conceptual understanding of biotechnology and can also be used as an alternative for evaluating student learning outcomes.

Copyright

© 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Rukayah
AU  - Idam Ragil Widianto Atmojo
AU  - Hartono
AU  - Joko Daryanto
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/02/05
TI  - Conceptual Biotechnology Measured by Using a Two-Tier Multiple Test
BT  - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2019)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 565
EP  - 569
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.069
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.200129.069
ID  - 2020
ER  -