The Reasonableness Principles — The Argument of Indonesian Constitutional Court On Neutrality of Civil Servants for Good Governance
Authors
Dhia Al Uyun
Corresponding Author
Dhia Al Uyun
Available Online November 2017.
- DOI
- 10.2991/iclgg-17.2018.10How to use a DOI?
- Keywords
- neutrality; civil servants; human rights; election; profession
- Abstract
The Reasonableness Principles related with proportion, balanced of rights, can seen in some Indonesian Constitutional Court Decision. This decision, make difference rights election of civil servants and the others profession. The Human Rights of civil servants disturbed by this decision. The Neutrality is for all profession, so its, the state realizes human rights. It is not only on human rights but also ethics. This doctrinal research will critic some Indonesian Constitutional Court Decision and compare with Osborne and Canada case and others country on neutrality. It will describe the neutrality perception now and build it in the future.
- Copyright
- © 2018, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Dhia Al Uyun PY - 2017/11 DA - 2017/11 TI - The Reasonableness Principles — The Argument of Indonesian Constitutional Court On Neutrality of Civil Servants for Good Governance BT - Proceedings of the International Conference on Law, Governance and Globalization 2017 (ICLGG 2017) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 71 EP - 76 SN - 2352-5398 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/iclgg-17.2018.10 DO - 10.2991/iclgg-17.2018.10 ID - AlUyun2017/11 ER -