Problems in Law Ofmortgage Right (Law Number 4 of 1997)

DOI

10.2991/icglow-19.2019.33How to use a DOI?

Keywords

The validity of the Underwriting Right can be seen from the Credit Agreement

Abstract

Mortgage Law disregarding a number of civil problems, the rights of the parties in the relationship of mortgage rights cannot be fulfilled equitably, because procedural practices so far have not proceeded properly. Law Number 4 of 1997 does not provide clear rules, therefore creditor tends to dominate in the legal relationship. At the same time, debtor rights are neglected, they do not get justice because of the creditors' negligence. This research is explanatory, laying the footing of knowledge about mortgage rights to be a foothold in further research. This study found non-normative offenses that must be included in the Mortgage Law for legal development and fulfillment of rights in the institutional security rights.

Copyright

© 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - M. Husein Ahmadi
AU  - I.G.A.K. Rachmi Handayani
AU  - Lego Karjoko
PY  - 2019/10
DA  - 2019/10
TI  - Problems in Law Ofmortgage Right (Law Number 4 of 1997)
BT  - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 131
EP  - 132
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/icglow-19.2019.33
DO  - 10.2991/icglow-19.2019.33
ID  - Ahmadi2019/10
ER  -