Evaluating the Accuracy of Net Present Value and Initial Rate of Return Investment Rules
Authors
Zhen Wangu7237023@anu.edu.au
The Australian National University
Corresponding Author
Zhen Wangu7237023@anu.edu.au
Available Online 15 December 2021.
- DOI
- 10.2991/assehr.k.211209.215How to use a DOI?
- Keywords
- Net present value; Internal rate of return; Delayed investment; Multiple IRRs; No IRRs; Mutually exclusive projects
- Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to compare the accuracy of two investment decision-making methods, Net present value (NPV) and Internal rate of return (IRR), using four different hypothetical investigations, and to briefly assess the limitations of the NPV method. The use of the IRR rule results in incorrect judgments in four situations: delayed investment, multiple IRRs, no IRRs, and mutually exclusive projects (different scales). However, the judgment method shows the sensitivity of the investment decision to the uncertainty of the cost of capital estimation in the case of delayed investment and two IRRs.
- Copyright
- © 2021 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press International B.V.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Zhen Wang PY - 2021 DA - 2021/12/15 TI - Evaluating the Accuracy of Net Present Value and Initial Rate of Return Investment Rules BT - Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2021) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 1319 EP - 1322 SN - 2352-5428 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211209.215 DO - 10.2991/assehr.k.211209.215 ID - Wang2021 ER -