Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2020)

Comparison Between Classical Game Theory and Evolutionary Game Theory Focused on Prisoner’s Dilemma

Authors
Jingjing Dong
Corresponding Author
Jingjing Dong
Available Online 30 November 2020.
DOI
10.2991/aebmr.k.201128.025How to use a DOI?
Keywords
classical game theory, evolutionary game theory, prisoner’s dilemma
Abstract

Game theory is the study of multiple individuals or teams using related parties in the game to implement strategies under certain constraints. Prisoner’s Dilemma is a classic example of people using game theory for analysis. This paper compared the classical game theory and evolutionary game theory through searching information from various authoritative sources, to summarize and present some relative knowledge. The final conclusion is that evolutionary game theory is better than classical game theory when they are used for analyzing real life problems.

Copyright
© 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2020)
Series
Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research
Publication Date
30 November 2020
ISBN
978-94-6239-283-0
ISSN
2352-5428
DOI
10.2991/aebmr.k.201128.025How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - Jingjing Dong
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/11/30
TI  - Comparison Between Classical Game Theory and Evolutionary Game Theory Focused on Prisoner’s Dilemma
BT  - Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2020)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 125
EP  - 128
SN  - 2352-5428
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.201128.025
DO  - 10.2991/aebmr.k.201128.025
ID  - Dong2020
ER  -