Garden of Disorder: Rethinking the Effectiveness of Aesthetic Experiences
Authors
Qing Yong
Corresponding Author
Qing Yong
Available Online 14 February 2020.
- DOI
- 10.2991/assehr.k.191217.223How to use a DOI?
- Keywords
- aesthetic experience, artistic autonomy, aesthetic game
- Abstract
Aesthetics is an autonomous garden, which has become a trustworthy force in opening a new world for mankind due to its non-utilitarian nature. However, aesthetic autonomy is not the same as artistic autonomy. By distinguishing the similarities and differences between aesthetic games and aesthetics, as well as aesthetic autonomy and artistic autonomy, this paper concludes that people still need to return to Schiller’s “game” to find the essence of aesthetic experience. In what Jacques Rancière calls “sense of difference,” the aesthetic experience is still valid.
- Copyright
- © 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Qing Yong PY - 2020 DA - 2020/02/14 TI - Garden of Disorder: Rethinking the Effectiveness of Aesthetic Experiences BT - Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Inter-cultural Communication (ICELAIC 2019) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 718 EP - 721 SN - 2352-5398 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.191217.223 DO - 10.2991/assehr.k.191217.223 ID - Yong2020 ER -