Implications of Applying Criminal Money Substitutes to Co-ordination in Corruption Crimes as an Effort to Restore State Finances

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.211203.105How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Implications of Criminal Application of Surrogate Money; Co-ordination; Corruption Crimes; State Financial Recovery Efforts

Abstract

The application of substitute money crimes against coordination in the case of Corruption Crimes is stipulated in Article 18 paragraph (1) letter b, Law No. 31 of 1999 as amended into Law Number 20 of 2021 on Corrupt Crimes and in Article 6 of Supreme Court Regulation No. 5 of 2014. The implication of applying substitute money to coordination as perpetrators of corruption crimes lies in the issue of criminal liability. That is related to the question of the accuracy of legal liability between the chairman of the coordination or members of the coordination by the provisions of the applicable law, as an effort to recover state finances caused by corruption. On the other hand, this discussion also relates to whether or not criminal money is applied to the coordinator who commits corruption crimes. The research method used is normative juridical, by analyzing and reviewing the legislation governing the Implications of The Application of Substitute Money Criminal Against Coordination in Corruption Crimes As An Effort to Recover State Finances.

Copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.

Open Access

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Sugeng Riyadi
AU  - Faisal Santiago
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021/12/03
TI  - Implications of Applying Criminal Money Substitutes to Co-ordination in Corruption Crimes as an Effort to Restore State Finances
BT  - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Business Law and Local Wisdom in Tourism (ICBLT 2021)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 486
EP  - 492
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211203.105
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.211203.105
ID  - Riyadi2021
ER  -