Internal Conflict of Political Parties Post Reform (Case Study of Conflict Romahurmuziy - Djan Faridz in United Development Party)

DOI

10.2991/icamr-18.2019.98How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Political party, united development party, internal conflict

Abstract

Since the birth of the United Development Party (PPP), the party bearing the Ka'bah symbol has often been beset by conflict, both in the form of individual conflicts or giving birth to factions in internal party conflicts. Both during the New Order era and up to the current reforms, the conflict that engulfed PPP was due to differences in opinion of the elites, especially about the prospective leaders who would be carried forward before the general election or the change of party leaders through the PPP Conference. Aside from differences of opinion on the internal elite side, conflicts are also caused by party institutionalization which tends to be formal in resolving conflict problems, including when PPP is often difficult to solve internal problems, thus giving an opportunity for external parties (government) to intervene or intervene in PPP conflicts. This has implications for the progression of the continuity of the PPP conflict after the New Order between Romahurmuziy and Djan Faridz.

Copyright

© 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Munawir Arifin
AU  - Abdul Latief
AU  - Muhammad Nadir
AU  - Ahmad Al Yakin
AU  - Mr. Dermawan
PY  - 2019/04
DA  - 2019/04
TI  - Internal Conflict of Political Parties Post Reform (Case Study of Conflict Romahurmuziy - Djan Faridz in United Development Party)
BT  - Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Advanced Multidisciplinary Research (ICAMR 2018)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 404
EP  - 409
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/icamr-18.2019.98
DO  - 10.2991/icamr-18.2019.98
ID  - Arifin2019/04
ER  -