Artery Research

Volume 25, Issue Supplement 1, December 2019, Pages S127 - S127

P84 Prediction of Cardiovascular Events and Mortality by Pulse Wave Velocity: a Comparison of Invasive Measurements and Noninvasive Estimation Methods

Authors
Bernhard Hametner1, *, Siegfried Wassertheurer1, Christopher Clemens Mayer1, Kathrin Danninger2, Ronald Binder2, Thomas Weber2
1Center for Health & Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna, Austria
2Cardiology Department, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
*Corresponding author. Email: bernhard.hametner@ait.ac.at
Corresponding Author
Bernhard Hametner
Available Online 17 February 2020.
DOI
10.2991/artres.k.191224.114How to use a DOI?
Abstract

Introduction: Arterial properties are linked to the presence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary blood flow is strongly and inversely related to arterial stiffness. Thus, the aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the prognostic value of PWV in high-risk patients with suspected CAD and to compare three different methods for assessing PWV.

Methods: In 1040 patients, invasive PWV (iPWV) was measured during catheter pullback. Additionally, PWV was estimated with a model incorporating age and the central pulse waveform obtained from non-invasive measurements (ePWV). As a third method, PWV was calculated with a formula solely based on age and blood pressure (fPWV). Survival analysis was done for continuous PWV as well as using cut-off values.

Results: After a median follow up duration of 1565 days, 24% of the patients reached the combined endpoint (cardiovascular events and mortality). Cox proportional hazard ratios per m/s were 1.13 for iPWV, 1.17 for ePWV and 1.13 for fPWV (p < 0.0001 for all three methods). Significant differences between patient groups according to a cut-off value of 10 m/s were found as well for all three methods. However, multivariable Cox models revealed a different performance of the three methods, indicating weaknesses of fPWV to mimic iPWV.

Conclusion: All three methods for the determination of PWV predicted cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. This indicates that iPWV as well as both non-invasive estimation methods are suitable for the assessment of arterial stiffness, bearing in mind their individual characteristics.

Copyright
© 2019 Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology. Publishing services by Atlantis Press International B.V.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)
View full text (HTML)

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
25 - Supplement 1
Pages
S127 - S127
Publication Date
2020/02/17
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.2991/artres.k.191224.114How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2019 Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology. Publishing services by Atlantis Press International B.V.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bernhard Hametner
AU  - Siegfried Wassertheurer
AU  - Christopher Clemens Mayer
AU  - Kathrin Danninger
AU  - Ronald Binder
AU  - Thomas Weber
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/02/17
TI  - P84 Prediction of Cardiovascular Events and Mortality by Pulse Wave Velocity: a Comparison of Invasive Measurements and Noninvasive Estimation Methods
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - S127
EP  - S127
VL  - 25
IS  - Supplement 1
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.191224.114
DO  - 10.2991/artres.k.191224.114
ID  - Hametner2020
ER  -