Artery Research

Volume 25, Issue Supplement 1, December 2019, Pages S117 - S117

P73 The Relationship Between Different Measurements of Arterial Stiffness

Authors
Eszter Szabó*, Krisztina Gáspár, Ildikó Szabó, Viktória Kovács, Zsuzsanna Pál, Gábor Simonyi, Endre Kolossváry, Katalin Farkas
Szent Imre Teaching Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
*Corresponding author. Email: eszti870808@gmail.com
Corresponding Author
Eszter Szabó
Available Online 17 February 2020.
DOI
10.2991/artres.k.191224.104How to use a DOI?
Abstract

Background: Arterial stiffness is the characteristic of early vascular damage that can be measured by several methods. Sphygmocor determines the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV). Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) also measures PWV between heart and ankle, independently of blood pressure. According to results of several studies using these methods is a well-recognized predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Objectives: We compared these different methods of measuring early vascular damage in asymptomatic population with increased cardiovascular risk.

Methods: Database contained 40–95 years-old patients without cardiovascular diseases. Anamnestic and clinical data were collected, arterial stiffness was measured by Sphygmocor and CAVI. Atrial fibrillation, carotid atherosclerosis, and peripheral arterial disease were excluded.

Results: We included 100 patients (male/female–19/81; mean age–60.3 ± 10.7), 40% of patients had diabetes, 89% were obese, 70% had metabolic syndrome, 83% had hypertension and 63% had dyslipidemia. 29% of patients had abnormal (>10 m/s) PWV. CAVI above the reference value was detected 19% on the left and 23% on the right side of patients. Results of two different methods correlated significantly (p < 0.05, Pearson correlation). However, the coefficient of determination was low, 8.5%. In half of the abnormal values, both results were above the reference values.

Conclusion: Because of a few patients numbers, we can not draw far-reaching conclusions. However, we found more than 20% of asymptomatic patients with abnormal arterial stiffness. Relationship between two methods of arterial stiffness measurements was weak, which draws attention that these methods are not interchangeable. Role of these two methods in cardiovascular prognosis should be evaluated separately.

Copyright
© 2019 Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology. Publishing services by Atlantis Press International B.V.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)
View full text (HTML)

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
25 - Supplement 1
Pages
S117 - S117
Publication Date
2020/02/17
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.2991/artres.k.191224.104How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2019 Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology. Publishing services by Atlantis Press International B.V.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Eszter Szabó
AU  - Krisztina Gáspár
AU  - Ildikó Szabó
AU  - Viktória Kovács
AU  - Zsuzsanna Pál
AU  - Gábor Simonyi
AU  - Endre Kolossváry
AU  - Katalin Farkas
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/02/17
TI  - P73 The Relationship Between Different Measurements of Arterial Stiffness
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - S117
EP  - S117
VL  - 25
IS  - Supplement 1
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.191224.104
DO  - 10.2991/artres.k.191224.104
ID  - Szabó2020
ER  -