3.5 Arterial Stiffness Partly Explains Sex Differences in Associations Between Left Ventricular Structure and Mortality: The Southall and Brent Revisited (Sabre) Study

DOI

10.2991/artres.k.191224.018How to use a DOI?

Abstract

Background: We have previously shown that 3D echocardiography-derived (3DE) indices of left ventricular (LV) structure predict all-cause mortality differently in men and women [1]. However, the mechanism behind these sex differences remains unknown. We therefore examined the role of macro- and micro-vascular disease in explaining these sex differences.

Methods: 910 individuals (age, 69.7 ± 6.2 years; 77.7% male) from the SABRE study, a UK-largest tri-ethnic longitudinal cohort, underwent a health examination. Associations between 3DE-derived LV measures (end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) and LV remodeling index (LVRI)) and all-cause mortality were determined using multivariable Cox regression. Total arterial compliance (TAC), augmentation index (AI), eGFR and microalbuminuria were added to these models.

Results: 103 (14.5%) men and 17 (8.4%) women died over median follow-up of 8 years. After multivariable adjustment, lower LVRI, and higher volumes were independently associated with increased risk of mortality in men; however, associations were reversed in women (Table 1; p (interaction: LVRI = 0.034, EDV = 0.051, and ESV = 0.009)). TAC was lower in women (0.73 ± 0.24 vs 0.83 ± 0.27, p < 0.0001) and AI higher (156.1 ± 22.3 vs 145.4 ± 21, p < 0.0001; adjustment for TAC and AI attenuated the associations in women, but not in men (Table 1), resulting in smaller sex differences in associations. Adjustment for measures of microvascular disease had negligible effect on associations in men or women.

	Men, HR (95% CI), p	Women, HR (95% CI), p
3D LVRI†	(N = 689; 99 deaths, SD = 0.37 g/ml)	(N = 190; 16 deaths, SD = 0.34 g/ml)
Model 1	0.77 (0.63, 0.94), 0.012	1.5 (0.95, 2.5), 0.082
+ TAC	0.82 (0.66, 1.0), 0.071	1.25 (0.72, 2.1), 0.426
+ Central AI	0.82 (0.67, 1.0), 0.072 (N = 629; 89 deaths)	1.23 (0.67, 2.2), 0.504 (N = 170; 13 deaths)
+ TAC + Central AI	0.87 (0.70, 1.1), 0.260 (N = 629; 89 deaths)	1.1 (0.58, 2.0), 0.801 (N = 170; 13 deaths)
+ eGFR	0.79 (0.64, 0.96), 0.021	1.5 (0.95, 2.4), 0.083
+ Microalbuminuria	0.78 (0.64, 0.95), 0.015	1.6 (0.99, 2.8), 0.053
+ eGFR + Microalbuminuria	0.79 (0.65, 0.97), 0.023	1.6 (0.98, 2.7), 0.061
3D EDV	(N = 707; 103 deaths, SD = 9.9 ml/m2)	(N = 203; 17 deaths, SD = 7.3 ml/m2)
Model 1	1.26 (1.1, 1.5), 0.007	0.51 (0.25, 1.1), 0.076
+ TAC	1.23 (0.99, 1.5), 0.060	0.78 (0.29, 2.0), 0.613
+ Central AI	1.25 (1.04, 1.5), 0.013 (N = 646; 92 deaths)	0.75 (0.31, 1.8), 0.519 (N = 183; 14 deaths)
+ TAC + Central AI	1.22 (0.98, 1.5), 0.078 (N = 646; 92 deaths)	1.0 (0.38, 3.1), 0.871 (N = 183; 14 deaths)
+ eGFR	1.23(1.0, 1.45), 0.014	0.51 (0.25, 1.0), 0.071
+ Microalbuminuria	1.25 (1.0, 1.5), 0.010	0.60 (0.28, 1.3), 0.189
+ eGFR + Microalbuminuria	1.23 (1.0, 1.45), 0.016	0.57 (0.27, 1.2), 0.144
3D ESV	(N = 707; 103 deaths, SD = 6.1 ml/m2)	(N = 203; 17 deaths, SD = 3.7 ml/m2)
Model 1	1.37 (1.14, 1.66), 0.001	0.56 (0.31, 1.0), 0.048
+ TAC	1.34 (1.1, 1.6), 0.004	0.68 (0.36, 1.3), 0.221
+ Central AI	1.38 (1.13, 1.7), 0.001 (N = 646; 92 deaths)	0.72 (0.36, 1.4), 0.347 (N = 183; 14 deaths)
+ TAC + Central AI	1.35 (1.1, 1.7), 0.004 (N = 646; 92 deaths)	0.82 (0.40, 1.7), 0.598 (N = 183; 14 deaths)
3D ESV	(N = 707; 103 deaths, SD = 6.1 ml/m2)	(N = 203; 17 deaths, SD = 3.7 ml/m2)
+ eGFR	1.34 (1.1, 1.6), 0.002	0.58 (0.32,1.0), 0.059
+ Microalbuminuria	1.37 (1.1, 1.6), 0.001	0.58 (0.31, 1.1), 0.079
+ eGFR + Microalbuminuria	1.33 (1.1, 1.6), 0.002	0.61 (0.33, 1.1), 0.104

Model 1: adjusted for age, ethnicity, SBP, antihypertensive medication, cholesterol: HDL ratio, BMI, DM, smoking.

†

LV remodelling index (LVRI) defined as LV mass to end-diastolic volumes (EDV) ratio (the lower numbers for LVRI due to lower available numbers of LV mass (N= 879)). 3D ESV is log transformed. AI, augmentation index (%); EDV, end-diastolic volumes (ml/m²); eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (ml/min/1.73 m²); ESV, end-systolic volumes (ml/m²); HR, hazard ratio; LVRI, left ventricular remodelling index (g/ml); TAC, total arterial compliance (ml/mmHg); SD, standard deviation.

Table 1

Associations between 3DE-derived indices of LV structure and all-cause mortality

Conclusion: In a large tri-ethnic sample of the UK general population, sex differences in associations between 3DE LV structural measures and mortality seem to be partially explained by arterial stiffness and wave reflection.

Copyright

© 2019 Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology. Publishing services by Atlantis Press International B.V.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lamia Al Saikhan
AU  - Chloe Park
AU  - Therese Tillin
AU  - Jamil Mayet
AU  - Nish Chaturvedi
AU  - Alun Hughes
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/02/15
TI  - 3.5 Arterial Stiffness Partly Explains Sex Differences in Associations Between Left Ventricular Structure and Mortality: The Southall and Brent Revisited (Sabre) Study
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - S25
EP  - S26
VL  - 25
IS  - Supplement 1
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.191224.018
DO  - 10.2991/artres.k.191224.018
ID  - AlSaikhan2020
ER  -