4.4 Arterial Stiffness can be Modulated by Pressure-Independent Mechanisms in Hypertension

Luca Faconti; Bushra Farukh; Ryan McNally; Andrew Webb; Phil Chowienczyk

doi:10.2991/artres.k.191224.025

<Previous Article In Issue

Download article (PDF)

Next Article In Issue>

Volume 25, Issue Supplement 1, December 2019, Pages S33 - S33

4.4 Arterial Stiffness can be Modulated by Pressure-Independent Mechanisms in Hypertension

Authors

Luca Faconti^*, Bushra Farukh¹, Ryan McNally¹, Andrew Webb¹, Phil Chowienczyk¹

¹King’s College London, UK

^*Corresponding author. Email: luca.faconti@kcl.ac.uk

Corresponding Author

Luca Faconti

Available Online 15 February 2020.

DOI: 10.2991/artres.k.191224.025 How to use a DOI?
Abstract: Background: Effects of short-term interventions on large artery stiffness assessed by pulse wave velocity (PWV) have mainly been explained by concomitant changes in blood pressure (BP). However, lower body negative pressure (LBNP), which increases sympathetic activity (SA) has a specific effect on PWV in healthy volunteers [1].

Methods: We examined effects of lower limb venous occlusion (LVO), a similar intervention to LBNP that reduces BP but increases SA and device guided breathing (DBG), which reduces both BP and SA, on PWV in patients with essential hypertension (n = 70 after LVO, n = 45 after DGB and LVO in random order). The short acting calcium channel antagonist nifedipine was used as a control for changes in BP.

Results: LVO produced a small but significant reduction in mean arterial pressure of 1.8 (95% confidence-intervals, 0.3–3.4) mmHg. Despite this, aortic and carotid-femoral PWV increased during LVO by 0.8 (0.2–1.4) m/s and 0.7 (0.3–1.05) m/s respectively. When comparing effects of DGB with nifedipine (n = 19), nifedipine produced a greater reduction in mean arterial pressure compared to DGB (reduction of 13.4 (10.2–17.7) mmHg and 7.7 (6.4–9.0) mmHg respectively, p = 0.009 between the two) but the decrease in PWV was less than that observed with DGB (0.7 (0.1–1.5) m/s and 1.3 (0.8–1.8) m/s respectively, p = 0.022 between the two).

Conclusion: Arterial stiffness can be modulated independently of BP in patients with hypertension. The mechanism could involve alterations in SA influencing the tone of smooth muscle in the aortic wall.
Copyright: © 2019 Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology. Publishing services by Atlantis Press International B.V.
Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Reference

[1]M Nardone, AV Incognito, and PJ Millar, Evidence for pressure-independent sympathetic modulation of central pulse wave velocity, J Am Heart Assoc, Vol. 7, 2018. e007971.

<Previous Article In Issue

Download article (PDF)

Next Article In Issue>

Journal: Artery Research
Volume-Issue: 25 - Supplement 1
Pages: S33 - S33
Publication Date: 2020/02/15
ISSN (Online): 1876-4401
ISSN (Print): 1872-9312
DOI: 10.2991/artres.k.191224.025 How to use a DOI?
Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Cite this article

ris enw bib

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Luca Faconti
AU  - Bushra Farukh
AU  - Ryan McNally
AU  - Andrew Webb
AU  - Phil Chowienczyk
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/02/15
TI  - 4.4 Arterial Stiffness can be Modulated by Pressure-Independent Mechanisms in Hypertension
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - S33
EP  - S33
VL  - 25
IS  - Supplement 1
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.191224.025
DO  - 10.2991/artres.k.191224.025
ID  - Faconti2020
ER  -

download .riscopy to clipboard