Artery Research

<Previous Article In Issue
Download article (PDF)
Next Article In Issue>
Volume 24, Issue C, December 2018, Pages 111 - 111

P111 DISCREPANCY BETWEEN BRACHIAL AND INVASIVE INTRA-AORTIC PRESSURES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION

Authors
Azra Mahmud, Ali Allghamdi, Mohammad Balghith, Kamal Ayoub, Mohammad Fayaz Khan, Samir AlChighouri, Fawaz AlMutairi, Muayad AlZaibag
King Abdul Aziz Cardiac Center, King Abdul Aziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Available Online 4 December 2018.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.164How to use a DOI?
Abstract

Introduction: Invasive intra-aortic pressures are the gold standard for accurate Blood Pressure (BP) measurement. Hypertension management is guided by brachial cuff BP although its accuracy has been questioned. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that there may be a discrepancy between brachial and invasive intra-aortic BPs.

Methods: Invasive intra-aortic and brachial cuff pressures were recorded in some 3000 patients undergoing coronary angiography (mean age 58.6 ± 28, 23% female) between 2010 and 2016, at King Abdul AzizCardiac Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Clinical and angiographic data were collected from electronic medical records (Apollo Lx®).

Results: Cuff brachial BP underestimated intra-aortic systolic BP (−6.2 mm Hg;95% CI:−7.2 to −5.4 mmHg; p < 0.0001),but overestimated intra-aortic diastolic BP (2.5 mm Hg; 95% CI:1.5 to 3.8 mm Hg;p < 0.001). The discrepancy betweenintra-aortic and brachial systolic BP was significantly higher in women than men ( −15 mm Hg; 95% CI: −14 to −17 mm Hg vs. −3.9 mm Hg;95% CI: −2.8 to −4.1 mm Hg, p < 0.0001). Intra-aortic diastolic BP was overestimated by cuff BP in men (0.9 mm Hg; 95% CI;0.74 to 1.26, p < 0.0.001) but underestimated in women ( −3.6 mm Hg;95% CI:−3 to −4 mm Hg, p < 0.0001). While brachial BP correctly estimated intra-aortic systolic BP in subjects <50 yr-olds ( 0.13 mm Hg; 95% CI:−0.57 to 0.85 mm Hg, p = 0.68),there was a large discrepancy in >50 yr-olds ( −8.6 mm Hg; 95% CI: −8.1 to −9.5 mm Hg, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Brachial BP underestimates intra-aortic systolic BP, particularly in women, older subjects and at higher BPs with implications for HTN mangagement.

Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

<Previous Article In Issue
Download article (PDF)
Next Article In Issue>
Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
24 - C
Pages
111 - 111
Publication Date
2018/12/04
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.164How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

risenwbib
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Azra Mahmud
AU  - Ali Allghamdi
AU  - Mohammad Balghith
AU  - Kamal Ayoub
AU  - Mohammad Fayaz Khan
AU  - Samir AlChighouri
AU  - Fawaz AlMutairi
AU  - Muayad AlZaibag
PY  - 2018
DA  - 2018/12/04
TI  - P111 DISCREPANCY BETWEEN BRACHIAL AND INVASIVE INTRA-AORTIC PRESSURES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 111
EP  - 111
VL  - 24
IS  - C
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.164
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.164
ID  - Mahmud2018
ER  -