Artery Research

Volume 24, Issue C, December 2018, Pages 97 - 97

P66 REDUCTION IN AUGMENTATION PRESSURE IS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVEMENT OF EARLY VENTRICULAR EJECTION AFTER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT

Authors
Haotian Gu1, Ronak Rajani2, Phil Chowienczyk1
1King’s College London, London, UK
2St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
Available Online 4 December 2018.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.119How to use a DOI?
Abstract

Background: Previously regarded as a measure of pressure wave reflection, central augmentation pressure (AP) may be influenced by the pattern of early ventricular ejection. We examined the relationship of AP to first-phase ejection fraction (EF1), a measure of ventricular ejection up to the time of the first systolic peak in central pressure in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) before and after aortic valve replacement (AVR).

Methods: Carotid pressure, obtained by tonometry calibrated from peripheral mean and diastolic blood pressure, was used to calculate augmentation pressure (difference between the second and first systolic peaks of the aortic waveform). LV volume was obtained by echocardiography. EF1 was defined as the fraction of LV volume ejected from the start of systole to the time of the first systolic peak (T1) on the carotid pressure waveform. Aortic arch to abdominal aorta pulse wave velocity (aPWV) was measured by pulsed wave Doppler.

Results: 10 patients with severe AS (aged 75.8 ± 7.8 years) and preserved EF (62.2 ± 7.1%) were studied before and 48–72 hours after AVR. There was a significant reduction in mean arterial pressure (MAP) (pre:96.9 ± 12.3 mmHg vs post:83.4 ± 11.2 mmHg, p = 0.012) and AP (pre:20.8 ± 11.4 mmHg vs post:11.0 ± 5.8 mmHg, p = 0.017). EF1 improved significantly (pre:18.7 ± 6.8% vs post:28.9 ± 12.4%, p = 0.043), whilst EF did not change. aPWV didn’t change significantly after AVR. The change in EF1 was negatively associated with change in AP (β = −0.841, p = 0.002) (Figure 1). This relationship persisted after adjustment of age, gender, BMI, baseline MAP and aortic valve area (β = −1.095, p=0.033).

Conclusion: In patients with AS and preserved EF, an improvement of early ejection is associated with reduction in augmentation pressure after AVR.

Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Download article (PDF)
View full text (HTML)

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
24 - C
Pages
97 - 97
Publication Date
2018/12/04
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.119How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Haotian Gu
AU  - Ronak Rajani
AU  - Phil Chowienczyk
PY  - 2018
DA  - 2018/12/04
TI  - P66 REDUCTION IN AUGMENTATION PRESSURE IS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVEMENT OF EARLY VENTRICULAR EJECTION AFTER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 97
EP  - 97
VL  - 24
IS  - C
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.119
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.119
ID  - Gu2018
ER  -