Artery Research

Volume 24, Issue C, December 2018, Pages 82 - 83

P12 VALIDATION OF SYNTHESIZED CENTRAL PRESSURE WAVEFORM IN PATIENTS WITH AN INFRARENAL AORTIC ANEURYSM BEFORE AND AFTER ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR

Authors
Suzanne Holewijn1, Lennart van der Velde1, 2, Majorie van Helvert1, 2, Thomas Urgert1, 2, Gerike Buitenhuis1, 2, Erik Groot Jebbink2, 1, Michel Reijnen1
1Department of Vascular Surgery, Rijnstate, Arnhem, the Netherlands
2Multimodality Medical Imaging group, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, the Netherlands
Available Online 4 December 2018.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.065How to use a DOI?
Abstract

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) disease is mainly treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), which shows short-term advantages in terms of lower morbidity and mortality compared to open repair. Long-term outcome seems te be inferior with regard to survival. This could partly be explained by a change in dynamics of the aortic wall, including aortic central pressure (CP) waveforms, induced by the endograft (Figure). Arterial stiffness is predictive of cardiovascular disease but has not been investigated in AAA-patients. We investigated if CP and Augmentation index (AIX) can be calculated correctly in AAA-patients.

Methods: Non-invasive and invasive waveform recordings and CP- and stiffness-calculations were performed simultaneously before and after EVAR. Non-invasive radial artery waveforms were recorded, from which CP was estimated by SphymoCor (Atcor Medical, Sydney, Australia). Invasive pressure measurements were performed with a fluid-filled catheter in the infrarenal aorta. A generalized ascending-to-abdominal aorta transfer function (GTFAA) was used to estimate CP from the invasively measured abdominal aorta pressure-waveform, which served as reference for the non-invasively estimated CP. From the CP waves, systolic pressure and AIX were computed.

Results: The difference between the invasive and non-invasive peak CP showed a bias of 23.9 mmHg (limits-of– agreement: −37.2:85.0) before and a bias of 0.4 (−32.6:33.4) after implant. Mean AIX (SD) was −30.7(11.2) and −38.9(31.2) before and after implant, respectively.

Conclusion: Synthesizing CP with non-invasive measurements in combination with the use of a GTF in patients with AAA is feasible especially after EVAR. Differences in CP and AIX could be explained by differences in AAA-morphology or an error in phase unwrapping, which are currently investigated in-vitro and in-vivo (NCT01220245).

Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
24 - C
Pages
82 - 83
Publication Date
2018/12/04
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.065How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Suzanne Holewijn
AU  - Lennart van der Velde
AU  - Majorie van Helvert
AU  - Thomas Urgert
AU  - Gerike Buitenhuis
AU  - Erik Groot Jebbink
AU  - Michel Reijnen
PY  - 2018
DA  - 2018/12/04
TI  - P12 VALIDATION OF SYNTHESIZED CENTRAL PRESSURE WAVEFORM IN PATIENTS WITH AN INFRARENAL AORTIC ANEURYSM BEFORE AND AFTER ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 82
EP  - 83
VL  - 24
IS  - C
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.065
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.065
ID  - Holewijn2018
ER  -