P.037 PRESSURE WAVEFORM ESTIMATION IN THE COMMON CAROTID ARTERY – DIFFERENT METHODS IN COMPARISON
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.artres.2007.07.094How to use a DOI?
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.
Non-invasive blood pressure waveform estimation in the common carotid artery (CCA) would yield an indirect estimation of its mechanical properties. Assuming both diastolic (Pd) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) to be constant over the arterial tree and considering arteries as rotationally symmetrical, CCA pressure waveform (PCCA(t)) can be estimated by rescaling the diameter waveform in the CCA (DCCA(t)) on the radial artery (RaA) blood pressure waveform (PRaA(t)), using either a linear or an exponential estimation method.
11 normotensive volunteers were included. For each subject, 3 repeated measurements over three days with a weekly interval were performed in the RaA and the CCA simultaneously. PRaA(t) was measured using applanation tonometry, whereas DCCA(t) was measured with ultrasound.
Linear Estimation: DCCA(t) was linearly rescaled over PRaA(t) by equalizing diastolic and mean values of both waveforms: PCCA(t) = δ*DCCA(t)+Pd. Exponential Estimation: the CCA cross sectional area waveform, A(t), was exponentially rescaled over PRaA(t) according to: PCCA(t) = Pd*Exp (α*((ACCA(t)/Ad,CCA) −1)), iteratively adjusting α (stiffness index) to equalize RaA and CCA mean pressures.
The difference between systolic pressure values estimated by means of the two methods in the CCA is on average 2.6 ± 1.1 mmHg, approximately pressure-independent. The mean difference between the systolic pressure in the RaA and the CCA, using the exponential method, is 17.6 ± 6.3 mmHg. The difference between the radial MAP computed as integral mean and the one estimated with [1/3*Ps + 2/3*Pd] is −0.3 ± 3.4 mmHg. Estimation quality is not depending on the MAP value.
Cite this article
TY - JOUR AU - I. Zaccari AU - A.C. Rossi AU - E.M.H. Bosboom AU - P.J. Brands PY - 2007 DA - 2007/08/30 TI - P.037 PRESSURE WAVEFORM ESTIMATION IN THE COMMON CAROTID ARTERY – DIFFERENT METHODS IN COMPARISON JO - Artery Research SP - 61 EP - 61 VL - 1 IS - 2 SN - 1876-4401 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2007.07.094 DO - 10.1016/j.artres.2007.07.094 ID - Zaccari2007 ER -