Artery Research

Volume 1, Issue 2, September 2007, Pages 61 - 61

P.037 PRESSURE WAVEFORM ESTIMATION IN THE COMMON CAROTID ARTERY – DIFFERENT METHODS IN COMPARISON

Authors
I. Zaccari1, A.C. Rossi2, E.M.H. Bosboom3, P.J. Brands2
1Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
2Esaote Europe B.V., Maastricht, Netherlands
3Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
Available Online 30 August 2007.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2007.07.094How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Non-invasive blood pressure waveform estimation in the common carotid artery (CCA) would yield an indirect estimation of its mechanical properties. Assuming both diastolic (Pd) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) to be constant over the arterial tree and considering arteries as rotationally symmetrical, CCA pressure waveform (PCCA(t)) can be estimated by rescaling the diameter waveform in the CCA (DCCA(t)) on the radial artery (RaA) blood pressure waveform (PRaA(t)), using either a linear or an exponential estimation method.

11 normotensive volunteers were included. For each subject, 3 repeated measurements over three days with a weekly interval were performed in the RaA and the CCA simultaneously. PRaA(t) was measured using applanation tonometry, whereas DCCA(t) was measured with ultrasound.

Linear Estimation: DCCA(t) was linearly rescaled over PRaA(t) by equalizing diastolic and mean values of both waveforms: PCCA(t) = δ*DCCA(t)+Pd. Exponential Estimation: the CCA cross sectional area waveform, A(t), was exponentially rescaled over PRaA(t) according to: PCCA(t) = Pd*Exp (α*((ACCA(t)/Ad,CCA) −1)), iteratively adjusting α (stiffness index) to equalize RaA and CCA mean pressures.

The difference between systolic pressure values estimated by means of the two methods in the CCA is on average 2.6 ± 1.1 mmHg, approximately pressure-independent. The mean difference between the systolic pressure in the RaA and the CCA, using the exponential method, is 17.6 ± 6.3 mmHg. The difference between the radial MAP computed as integral mean and the one estimated with [1/3*Ps + 2/3*Pd] is −0.3 ± 3.4 mmHg. Estimation quality is not depending on the MAP value.

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
1 - 2
Pages
61 - 61
Publication Date
2007/08/30
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2007.07.094How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - I. Zaccari
AU  - A.C. Rossi
AU  - E.M.H. Bosboom
AU  - P.J. Brands
PY  - 2007
DA  - 2007/08/30
TI  - P.037 PRESSURE WAVEFORM ESTIMATION IN THE COMMON CAROTID ARTERY – DIFFERENT METHODS IN COMPARISON
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 61
EP  - 61
VL  - 1
IS  - 2
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2007.07.094
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2007.07.094
ID  - Zaccari2007
ER  -