Artery Research

Volume 4, Issue 4, December 2010, Pages 149 - 149

5.5 WHY DO PATIENTS WITH AORTIC STENOSIS AND UNOBSTRUCTED CORONARY ARTERIES SUFFER FROM ANGINA? INSIGHTS FROM TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE INSERTION (TAVI)

Authors
S. Sen*, N. Hadjiloizou, A.J. Baksi, D.P. Francis, K. Parker, A.D. Hughes, R. Casula, A. Chuckwuemeka, R.A. Foale, I. Malik, G. Mikhail, J. Mayet, J.E. Davies
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
*Corresponding author.
Corresponding Author
S. Sen
Available Online 2 December 2010.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2010.10.176How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Introduction: It is unclear how aortic stenosis causes angina despite unobstructed coronary arteries. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI), permitting the instantaneous abolition of the stenosis, allows quantification of the direct physiological impact of the stenosis independent of associated pathologies such as left ventricular hypertrophy.

Methods: Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity were measured immediately before and after TAVI in six patients with unobstructed coronary arteries. We calculated the intra-coronary diastolic suction wave (the principal accelerator of coronary blood flow). To test physiological reserve to increased myocardial demand, we measured pressure and flow velocity at rest and during pacing at 90 and 120 beats per minute.

Results: Prior to TAVI the basal myocardial suction wave intensity was 2.2±1x10−5 Wm−2s−2, and increased in magnitude with increasing severity of aortic stenosis (r=0.82, p=0.04). This wave decreased markedly with pacing at higher heart rate (β coefficient=−0.19 x10−4 Wm−2s−2, p=0.003). After TAVI despite a fall in basal suction wave (2.2±1 v 1.0±0.4x10−5 Wm−2s−2, p<0.004), there was an immediate improvement in coronary physiological reserve as assessed with pacing (β coefficient=0.12 x10−4 Wm−2s−2, p=0.014).

Conclusions: In aortic stenosis, the coronary physiological reserve is reversed: instead of increasing with increased myocardial demand, the coronary diastolic suction wave paradoxically decreases. Immediately after TAVI, this physiological reserve returns to a normal positive pattern. This may explain why patients with aortic stenosis suffer from angina despite unobstructed coronaries and the prompt relief of angina after TAVI.

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
4 - 4
Pages
149 - 149
Publication Date
2010/12/02
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2010.10.176How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - S. Sen
AU  - N. Hadjiloizou
AU  - A.J. Baksi
AU  - D.P. Francis
AU  - K. Parker
AU  - A.D. Hughes
AU  - R. Casula
AU  - A. Chuckwuemeka
AU  - R.A. Foale
AU  - I. Malik
AU  - G. Mikhail
AU  - J. Mayet
AU  - J.E. Davies
PY  - 2010
DA  - 2010/12/02
TI  - 5.5 WHY DO PATIENTS WITH AORTIC STENOSIS AND UNOBSTRUCTED CORONARY ARTERIES SUFFER FROM ANGINA? INSIGHTS FROM TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE INSERTION (TAVI)
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 149
EP  - 149
VL  - 4
IS  - 4
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2010.10.176
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2010.10.176
ID  - Sen2010
ER  -