Artery Research

Volume 8, Issue 4, December 2014, Pages 173 - 173

PO-20 AORTIC HEMODYNAMICS FOLLOWING DISCONTINUATION OF MENOPAUSAL HORMONE THERAPY IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN

Authors
M.C. Johnsona, R.E. Harveya, b, S.M. Krusea, M.J. Joynera, V.M. Millerb, c, J.N. Barnesa, b
aDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
bDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
cDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
Available Online 4 November 2014.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2014.09.026How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Background and Objective: Arterial stiffness and aortic hemodynamics are important determinants of cardiovascular disease risk. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) reduces progression of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women due to its effects on the endothelium and smooth muscle of the central and peripheral vasculature. However, it remains unclear whether these effects are sustained after MHT cessation. We hypothesized that MHT administered early during the menopausal transition (less than three years from menopause) would not produce a sustained protective effect on aortic hemodynamics in women following discontinuation of MHT.

Methods: We studied fifty-seven women, as part of the Mayo Clinic Specialized Center of Research on Sex Differences, who were randomized into either oral conjugated equine estrogen (oCEE, n=15), transdermal 17β estradiol (tE2, n=20), or placebo (n=22) for four years. After a three year washout period, aortic hemodynamics were measured using radial arterial applanation tonometry.

Results: Age, body mass index and mean arterial pressure were similar among the women. Augmentation index (AIx) was similar among groups (32.6±2.3%, 33.9±1.9%, 31.5±1.9%; oCEE vs. tE2 vs. placebo, respectively, p>0.05) and did not change when normalized for heart rate at 75 bpm (27.6±2.3%, 28.2±1.6%, 25.7±1.8%; oCEE vs. tE2 vs. placebo, respectively, p>0.05). There were no differences in augmented pressure (12.6±1.6, 13.6±1.2, 12.0±0.9 mmHg; oCEE vs. tE2 vs. placebo, respectively, p>0.05) or left ventricular wasted energy (2843±170, 3208±360, 2559±205 dyne·cm2·sec; oCEE vs. tE2 vs. placebo, respectively, p>0.05) among the three groups.

Conclusion: These data suggest that any changes in aortic hemodynamics during MHT use are not sustained following MHT discontinuation.

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
8 - 4
Pages
173 - 173
Publication Date
2014/11/04
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2014.09.026How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - M.C. Johnson
AU  - R.E. Harvey
AU  - S.M. Kruse
AU  - M.J. Joyner
AU  - V.M. Miller
AU  - J.N. Barnes
PY  - 2014
DA  - 2014/11/04
TI  - PO-20 AORTIC HEMODYNAMICS FOLLOWING DISCONTINUATION OF MENOPAUSAL HORMONE THERAPY IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 173
EP  - 173
VL  - 8
IS  - 4
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2014.09.026
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2014.09.026
ID  - Johnson2014
ER  -