Artery Research

Volume 5, Issue 4, December 2011, Pages 168 - 168

P5.18 BRONCHOCONSTRICTION DOES NOT SIGNIFICANTLY ALTER CENTRAL HAEMODYNAMICS IN HEALTHY YOUNG ADULTS

Authors
J.E. Sharman, J. Marrone, J. Walls, D.P. Johns, R. Wood-Baker, E.H. Walters
Menzies Research Institute, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
Available Online 29 November 2011.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.073How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Background: Cardiovascular disease is the most frequent cause of death in people with chronic respiratory disease. Whether this association is due to shared comorbidities or adverse respiratory function exerting detrimental cardiovascular effects is unknown. This study aimed to determine the cardiovascular effect of methacholine-induced acute airway obstruction.

Methods: Fifteen healthy young adults (aged 22.9±2.5 years; 4 male; mean±SD) underwent a bronchial challenge test in which they were randomized in a blinded cross-over design to receive nebulized methacholine inhalation in serially increasing concentrations (from 0.39 to 25 mg/ml) or saline (0.9%; control) on two separate days. Airflow obstruction was assessed by forced expiratory volume at second (FEV1) and cardiovascular effects by brachial BP (oscillometry), central BP, augmentation index (AIx) and aortic stiffness (applanation tonometry).

Results: Methacholine caused a significant decrease in FEV1 (bronchoconstriction) from baseline to peak inhalation compared with saline (−0.48±0.34 vs −0.07±0.16 L; p<0.001), but no significant between-group change in aortic stiffness (0.2±1.3 vs 0.8±1.8 m/s; p=0.20), AIx (1.6±7.0 vs 3.7±10.2%; p=0.49), brachial SBP (−3.3±7.6 vs −4.7±5.7 mmHg; p=0.59), central SBP (−1.1±5.2 vs −0.3±5.5 mmHg; p=0.73), or heart rate (0.4±7.1 vs −0.8±6.6 bpm; p=0.45). See figure for FEV1 and central SBP responses to inhaled methacholine (*P=0.012, **P<0.0001).

Conclusions: Methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction does not change cardiovascular function, as assessed by aortic stiffness, brachial and central BP in healthy young adults. A comparison of the responses in people with airway disease would be of interest and may help to elucidate the connection between cardiovascular and respiratory disease.

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
5 - 4
Pages
168 - 168
Publication Date
2011/11/29
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.073How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - J.E. Sharman
AU  - J. Marrone
AU  - J. Walls
AU  - D.P. Johns
AU  - R. Wood-Baker
AU  - E.H. Walters
PY  - 2011
DA  - 2011/11/29
TI  - P5.18 BRONCHOCONSTRICTION DOES NOT SIGNIFICANTLY ALTER CENTRAL HAEMODYNAMICS IN HEALTHY YOUNG ADULTS
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 168
EP  - 168
VL  - 5
IS  - 4
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.073
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.073
ID  - Sharman2011
ER  -