Artery Research

Volume 25, Issue Supplement 1, December 2019, Pages S122 - S122

P79 Non-invasive Estimation of Central Pressures in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Patients and Changes in PWV After EVAR

Authors
Suzanne Holewijn1, *, Lennart van de Velde2, 3, Jenske Vermeulen4, 3, Michel Reijnen3, 2
1Rijnstate, Vascular Research Center, Arnhem, Netherlands
2Multimodality Medical Imaging Group, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede
3Rijnstate, Department of Vascular Surgery, Arnhem, Netherlands
4RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, Netherlands
*Corresponding author. Email: holewijnsuzanne@gmail.com
Corresponding Author
Suzanne Holewijn
Available Online 17 February 2020.
DOI
10.2991/artres.k.191224.109How to use a DOI?
Abstract

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) disease is mainly treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and PWV has been shown to increase after EVAR. Arterial stiffness is predictive of cardiovascular disease, but has not been investigated in AAA-patients. We investigated if central pressures (CP) can be estimated correctly in AAA-patients and changes over time in pulse wave velocity (PWV), since PWV-changes during follow-up are currently unknown.

Methods: Non-invasive (SphygmoCor) and invasive waveform recordings were performed simultaneously before and after EVAR. A generalized ascending-to-abdominal aorta transfer function (GTFAA) was used to estimate CP from the invasively measured abdominal aorta pressure-waveform, and compared to the non-invasively estimated CP. Changes in PWV were evaluated compared to baseline (6-weeks and 1-year).

Results: The mean difference between invasive and non-invasive central systolic pressure was −11.5 mmHg (limits-of–agreement: −63.5; 40.6) before and 0.03 (−33.5; 33.6) after implant. For central diastolic and mean pressure mean difference was −12.2 (−39.3; 14.8) and −9.6 (−45.3; 26.1), respectively. Median (IQR) PWV was 10.5 (9.2; 13.2) at baseline, 10.5 (10.1; 12.4) at discharge, 11.5 (10.6; 12.9) at 6 weeks, and 11.3 (9.9; 13.0) at 1 year follow-up without significant differences over time. Increases in CP were equal to peripheral pressure increases.

Conclusion: Synthesizing CP with non-invasive measurements in combination with the use of a GTFAA in patients with AAA is feasible especially after EVAR. No changes over time in PWV were observed. Current ongoing analyses include evaluation by prosthesis type, wave type, and influence of intra-luminal thrombus (NCT01220245).

Copyright
© 2019 Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology. Publishing services by Atlantis Press International B.V.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)
View full text (HTML)

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
25 - Supplement 1
Pages
S122 - S122
Publication Date
2020/02/17
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.2991/artres.k.191224.109How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2019 Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology. Publishing services by Atlantis Press International B.V.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Suzanne Holewijn
AU  - Lennart van de Velde
AU  - Jenske Vermeulen
AU  - Michel Reijnen
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/02/17
TI  - P79 Non-invasive Estimation of Central Pressures in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Patients and Changes in PWV After EVAR
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - S122
EP  - S122
VL  - 25
IS  - Supplement 1
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.191224.109
DO  - 10.2991/artres.k.191224.109
ID  - Holewijn2020
ER  -