Artery Research

Volume 12, Issue C, December 2015, Pages 26 - 26

P6.7 DETERMINANTS FOR DIFFERENCES IN CENTRAL SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE CAUSED BY DIFFERENT CALIBRATION METHODS

Authors
Christopher Mayer1, Martin Bauhofer2, Bernhard Hametner1, Christoph Schmaderer2, Uwe Heemann2, Siegfried Wassertheurer*1, Marcus Baumann2
1AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Vienna, Austria
2Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Available Online 23 November 2015.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2015.10.291How to use a DOI?
Abstract

Introduction: There are known issues and ongoing discussions regarding calibration methods using peripheral mean and diastolic or peripheral systolic and diastolic pressure for the determination of central systolic blood pressure. The aim of this cross-sectional study is an analysis of determinants for the differences in central systolic blood pressure between the two calibration methods.

Methods: All measurements were obtained with the Mobil-O-Graph 24h PWA monitor calibrated with both calibration methods within the ISAR hemodialysis study. Measurement started after a short dialysis interval prior to dialysis and lasted for 24-hours. Peripheral and central systolic blood pressures were averaged. 345 patients (231 male / 114 female; 65 +− 15 years) were included and grouped according to peripheral systolic blood pressure and one of the following factors: age, sex, body-mass-index, diabetes mellitus, length of dialysis and coronary artery disease.

Results: There is a significant influence of age, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease, but not of sex, body-mass-index and length of dialysis. Exemplarily, significant differences in central systolic blood pressure were 12.5 +− 7.3 (pSBP <= 130 mmHg, no diabetes mellitus), 17.0 +− 9.9 mmHg (pSBP <= 130 mmHg, diabetes mellitus), 18.6 +− 11.3 mmHg (pSBP > 130 mmHg, no diabetes mellitus) and 26.1 +− 16.2 (pSBP > 130 mmHg, diabetes mellitus).

Conclusions: These findings enhance our understanding of the differences in the two calibration methods. These results are generally assumed to play a role in future risk classification. It is suggested that the association of these factors is investigated in future studies.

Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Download article (PDF)
View full text (HTML)

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
12 - C
Pages
26 - 26
Publication Date
2015/11/23
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2015.10.291How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Christopher Mayer
AU  - Martin Bauhofer
AU  - Bernhard Hametner
AU  - Christoph Schmaderer
AU  - Uwe Heemann
AU  - Siegfried Wassertheurer*
AU  - Marcus Baumann
PY  - 2015
DA  - 2015/11/23
TI  - P6.7 DETERMINANTS FOR DIFFERENCES IN CENTRAL SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE CAUSED BY DIFFERENT CALIBRATION METHODS
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 26
EP  - 26
VL  - 12
IS  - C
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2015.10.291
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2015.10.291
ID  - Mayer2015
ER  -