Artery Research

Volume 24, Issue C, December 2018, Pages 118 - 118

P135 SYSTEMIC CARDIOVASCULAR INPUTS IN MODELS ESTIMATING INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE MAGNITUDE AND WAVEFORM

Authors
Julio A. Lara-Hernández, Isabella Tan, Mark Butlin, Alberto P. Avolio
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
Available Online 4 December 2018.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.188How to use a DOI?
Abstract

Background: Monitoring Intracranial Pressure (ICP) is key for appropriate clinical treatment of patients with conditions potentially causing raised ICP. The adequacy of using Heart Rate (HR), aortic Blood Pressure (aBP) and carotid Blood Flow (cBF) to estimate ICP magnitude (pulse and mean) and waveform is investigated as an alternative means to invasive ICP measurement.

Methods: ICP (sequentially raised from resting ICP to 30–40 mmHg with infusions of artificial intracranial fluid), aBP (lowered with sodium nitroprusside and raised with phenylephrine, 30 μg/kg/min, across a physiological range), HR (paced at 400 and 500 bpm), and cBF were measured in 11 anaesthetised Sprague Dawley rats. Potential cardiovascular predictors of ICP magnitude were assessed by stepwise mixed-model regression. Two transfer function models were constructed to estimate the ICP waveform from aBP or cBF waveforms.

Results: Systolic, mean and diastolic aBP as well as peak and minimum cBF had significant predictive value for mean ICP (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.25). HR (p < 0.05), systolic and mean aBP (p < 0.001), peak (p < 0.001), mean (p < 0.05) and minimum (p < 0.01) cBF had significant value for pulse ICP (R2 = 0.35). The transfer function models showed potential to reproduce the ICP waveform (Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)≤4 mmHg), being more accurate for mean aBP above 100 mmHg and mean ICP below 20 mmHg (RMSE ≤ 0.5 mmHg).

Conclusions: The models developed from the comprehensive rat experiment demonstrated that systemic cardiovascular measures have predictive value in estimating the ICP magnitude and waveform, but other inputs may be necessary to improve accuracy in estimating ICP across the full physiological range.

Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Download article (PDF)
View full text (HTML)

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
24 - C
Pages
118 - 118
Publication Date
2018/12/04
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.188How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Julio A. Lara-Hernández
AU  - Isabella Tan
AU  - Mark Butlin
AU  - Alberto P. Avolio
PY  - 2018
DA  - 2018/12/04
TI  - P135 SYSTEMIC CARDIOVASCULAR INPUTS IN MODELS ESTIMATING INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE MAGNITUDE AND WAVEFORM
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 118
EP  - 118
VL  - 24
IS  - C
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.188
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2018.10.188
ID  - Lara-Hernández2018
ER  -